Stephan Torre
@stephantorre.bsky.social
340 followers 430 following 83 posts
Philosopher at University of Aberdeen Website: https://stephantorre.com/ "Words are like weapons; they wound sometimes." -Cher
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Stephan Torre
iai.tv
The received view in physics is that the direction of time is provided by the second law of thermodynamics, according to which the passage of time is measured by ever-increasing disorder in the universe. | https://bit.ly/4mpjriZ

This view, Julian Barbour argues, is wrong.

#philsci ⚛️ 🧪
Time is the increase of order, not disorder | Julian Barbour
The received view in physics is that the direction of time is provided by the second law of thermodynamics, according to which the passage of time is measured by ever-increasing disorder in the univer...
bit.ly
stephantorre.bsky.social
Cool clouds on the school run today.
stephantorre.bsky.social
Really looking forward to this.
Reposted by Stephan Torre
samanthabrennan.bsky.social
Tenure track philosophy job in Canada

Western University’s Department of Philosophy seeks to hire a Asst Professor with an area of specialization in one or more of metaphysics,
epistemology, and logic, broadly construed). The anticipated start date is July 1,
2026

www.uwo.ca/facultyrelat...
www.uwo.ca
Reposted by Stephan Torre
atorza.bsky.social
Coming up: 8th Parma Workshop on Semantics and Pragmatics.
Reposted by Stephan Torre
franzberto.bsky.social
Paper forthcoming in Erkenntnis, preprint here:

philpapers.org/archive/BERS...
Reposted by Stephan Torre
thebjps.bsky.social
Time Reversal Invariance and Ontology
– Ward Struyve

Abstract in alt text or read it here:
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...

#philsci #philsky
ABSTRACT. Albert and Callender have challenged the received view that theories like classical electrodynamics and non-relativistic quantum mechanics are time-reversal invariant. They claim that time reversal should correspond to the mere reversal of the temporal order of the instantaneous states without any accompanying change of the instantaneous state itself, as in the standard view. Given this, they claim that these theories are not time-reversal invariant. The view of Albert and Callender has been much criticized, with many philosophers arguing that time reversal may correspond to more than the reversal of the temporal order. This article will not so much engage with that aspect of the debate, but rather deflate the disagreement by exploiting the ontological underdetermination. Namely, it will be argued that with a suitable choice of ontology, these theories are in fact time-reversal invariant in the sense of Albert and Callender, in agreement with the standard view.
stephantorre.bsky.social
Or Sam says "I'm right behind you!"
stephantorre.bsky.social
The fact: that he loves me.
stephantorre.bsky.social
But what if the content includes Sam. What he said was "I love you".
stephantorre.bsky.social
I know you well enough to know that there is one.
stephantorre.bsky.social
But do the Russell Group unis have alpacas?
stephantorre.bsky.social
Sure. What's the problem?
Reposted by Stephan Torre
dvngrm.bsky.social
Philosophy of Time Society at the Central APA (2026)

We request submissions of high-quality abstracts (500 words max.) for our group meeting at the Central APA in Chicago, IL, February 18–21, 2026.

Deadline: 25th August 2025.

www.philtimesociety.com/calls-for-pa...
Calls for Papers/Abstracts | Philosophy of Time Society
www.philtimesociety.com