SteveBev
banner
stevebev.bsky.social
SteveBev
@stevebev.bsky.social
BichonAtLaw aided by my occasionally useful human
This⬇️ is lying fucking bullshit by Bovino bsky.app/profile/crai...
Greg Bovino accuses the man that ICE just murdered in Minneapolis of "approaching them violently with a 9mm handgun" and says CBP "fired defensive shots" because "he wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement. Then 200 rioters arrived at the scene."
January 24, 2026 at 9:45 PM
The above proposition based on analysis of video of actions leading up to the shooting is reinforced by

The evidence of what happened in the aftermath bsky.app/profile/your...

The GreyJacket plainly didn’t sufficiently alert his colleagues to what HE had done with the GUN 👀👀👀
Footage from the immediate aftermath of the Alex Pretti murder shows a Trump regime thug searching through Pretti's body, yelling: "Where is the fucking gun? where is the gun?!" Other regime thugs point behind him, showing the gun far away from the scene. #3E #GoodvsEvil
January 24, 2026 at 9:40 PM
2 contd
FAILING to alert colleagues that the hand gun was seized‼️
3 Thereby CAUSING them to react y shooting the DISARMED man.

Fucking murderous incompetence ‼️
January 24, 2026 at 9:26 PM
The other video shows the GreyJacket seizing the gun from the waist band of the man on his knees
then walking away to the side of a vehicle.
As he moves away so do other ICE agents
The circumstances are consistent with GreyJacket
1 Alerting colleagues to the victims gun
2 FAILING to alert
1/2
January 24, 2026 at 9:23 PM
And too reinforce that point:
It is notable IMHO,
GreyJacket, who eventually took the gun,
had previously kicked away a teargas canister(dropped by ICE and rolling on the ground)
neither Greyjacket nor any agent
were at all concerned about a gun at that point,
as he tidied up a dropped weapon👀
January 24, 2026 at 6:23 PM
Correct. It is notable IMHO, that GreyJacket who eventually took the gun, had previously kicked away a teargas canister(dropped by ICE and rolling on the ground) he was clearly not at all concerned about a gun at that point ‼️
January 24, 2026 at 6:14 PM
The gun ultimately held by Greyjacket man in his R hand, appears to be taken by him from the person’s waist band on the RHS when the person is on his knees. At no point does it seem that the person now deceased held the gun, or even reached for it.

greyjacket had kicked away a tear gas can
January 24, 2026 at 5:36 PM
Raiklin is such a low life POS.
He is deranged, and beyond redemption.
The nature of the taunts and provocations he employs proves it beyond doubt.
Fucking Nazi, Fuck him.
January 22, 2026 at 10:46 PM
The use of the word “warrant” in the phrase “immigration enforcement warrant” is apt to deceive.

“Immigration Official authorized decision: enforcement order”

More aptly conveys the nature of the written authority and its institutional source and process.
January 22, 2026 at 8:47 PM
The word “Judge” in the title “Immigration Judge” is apt to deceive.

‘Immigration Status Assessment Officer’ perhaps conveys better understanding of their role and place in the hierarchy.
January 22, 2026 at 8:26 PM
If you think it’s about important principles embodied in the Nobel Prize,
why do you invest so little consideration in the Nobel Committees capacity to determine for themselves how to best exercise the trust reposed in them?

You have spent all of 1 day considering this. FUCKING AMATEUR
January 17, 2026 at 1:03 AM
You don’t understand what an ad hominem attack is👀
Which failure places you on a particularly low capability of assessing logical argument

Hint: it is not ad hominem to characterise a flawed argument, when the reason for the characterisation is stated, and especially not when the reason is true!
January 17, 2026 at 12:51 AM
Mockery here is well deserved, and harassment of a Nobel committee is not.
The people who confuse activism, with pressuring the wrong target on deeply faulty grounds deserve the mockery they get. Sadly you place yourself in the madding crowd of kaktivists, and are all the sillier for it.
January 17, 2026 at 12:42 AM
LOL after this witlessness:

“ i just believe he is bad for our planet and all its denizens, so the committe shouldn't support.”

I am unsurprised by any faulty conclusions you reach be any process you imagine approximates to reasoning.
January 17, 2026 at 12:16 AM
Hmm
Why should the Nobel Committee be the tool to execute the outcome you think is desirable to embarrass Trump or Marchado?

The Committee is an entirely independent agency exercising a narrow justification to determine the award of a prize on behalf of a Trust.

They are not your plaything.
January 17, 2026 at 12:10 AM