@stochasticity.bsky.social
WTF?!
Wait; so if you pay you can keep using it???
They are literally extorting people for their content?
wow... We are definitely in a new period.
Wait; so if you pay you can keep using it???
They are literally extorting people for their content?
wow... We are definitely in a new period.
April 25, 2025 at 1:28 AM
WTF?!
Wait; so if you pay you can keep using it???
They are literally extorting people for their content?
wow... We are definitely in a new period.
Wait; so if you pay you can keep using it???
They are literally extorting people for their content?
wow... We are definitely in a new period.
God; you just reminded me we have yet to see the full fallout of 4chan.
There could be more of these losers..... o_0
There could be more of these losers..... o_0
April 25, 2025 at 1:18 AM
God; you just reminded me we have yet to see the full fallout of 4chan.
There could be more of these losers..... o_0
There could be more of these losers..... o_0
God forbid we defend our stances.
X really is the place for snowflakes to reign free.
Unbelievable.
X really is the place for snowflakes to reign free.
Unbelievable.
April 25, 2025 at 12:56 AM
God forbid we defend our stances.
X really is the place for snowflakes to reign free.
Unbelievable.
X really is the place for snowflakes to reign free.
Unbelievable.
ok, that's not even threatening.
He should grow up. Until then, we fight it.
I'm not letting it go.
He should grow up. Until then, we fight it.
I'm not letting it go.
April 25, 2025 at 12:17 AM
ok, that's not even threatening.
He should grow up. Until then, we fight it.
I'm not letting it go.
He should grow up. Until then, we fight it.
I'm not letting it go.
nuff said!
April 25, 2025 at 12:07 AM
nuff said!
Does this have anything to do with that "ghost" guy?
April 24, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Does this have anything to do with that "ghost" guy?
Reposted
Ahem, you are platforming DISINFORMATION.
If you thought my stance was important, you should have contacted me for comment. Isn't that established journalistic practice? Claims of representing "both sides" won't work to obscure your intentional attempts at manipulating the American public.
If you thought my stance was important, you should have contacted me for comment. Isn't that established journalistic practice? Claims of representing "both sides" won't work to obscure your intentional attempts at manipulating the American public.
Kamala Harris lost because representation politics couldn't mask her terrible campaign
Kamala Harris lost the presidential election because why have right-wing-lite, when you can have the real thing in Trump?
www.thecanary.co
December 4, 2024 at 9:29 PM
Ahem, you are platforming DISINFORMATION.
If you thought my stance was important, you should have contacted me for comment. Isn't that established journalistic practice? Claims of representing "both sides" won't work to obscure your intentional attempts at manipulating the American public.
If you thought my stance was important, you should have contacted me for comment. Isn't that established journalistic practice? Claims of representing "both sides" won't work to obscure your intentional attempts at manipulating the American public.
Reposted
The article above is not simply "criticizing the Democrats".
In fact, your publication has clearly demonstrated a pattern of unethical behavior and shoddy "journalism" which was covered by the AI account. Some of the content was published with no byline.
What's that about? 🤔
In fact, your publication has clearly demonstrated a pattern of unethical behavior and shoddy "journalism" which was covered by the AI account. Some of the content was published with no byline.
What's that about? 🤔
December 4, 2024 at 9:49 PM
The article above is not simply "criticizing the Democrats".
In fact, your publication has clearly demonstrated a pattern of unethical behavior and shoddy "journalism" which was covered by the AI account. Some of the content was published with no byline.
What's that about? 🤔
In fact, your publication has clearly demonstrated a pattern of unethical behavior and shoddy "journalism" which was covered by the AI account. Some of the content was published with no byline.
What's that about? 🤔
Reposted
I am building this in response to two+ years of hate and disinformation go mostly unchecked, so we don't have to hope and pray the platform a) staffs up and b) agrees.
The most egregious violations of ToS were waved through on XChan, depending on the whim of the owner. X's ToS mean nothing.
The most egregious violations of ToS were waved through on XChan, depending on the whim of the owner. X's ToS mean nothing.
November 15, 2024 at 6:53 PM
I am building this in response to two+ years of hate and disinformation go mostly unchecked, so we don't have to hope and pray the platform a) staffs up and b) agrees.
The most egregious violations of ToS were waved through on XChan, depending on the whim of the owner. X's ToS mean nothing.
The most egregious violations of ToS were waved through on XChan, depending on the whim of the owner. X's ToS mean nothing.