Sue
@sueake.bsky.social
Messer about in the garden, cat lover and reader. Lefty, feminist, 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️ally.
Reposted by Sue
TLDR:
Positive reforms totally outweighed by massive cuts to incomes for disabled people & carers.
Will cause serious hardship & risk people forced to turn to food banks.
Cuts to PIP have NOTHING to do with increasing employment. Purely for short-term savings. Likely to damage employment goals.
Positive reforms totally outweighed by massive cuts to incomes for disabled people & carers.
Will cause serious hardship & risk people forced to turn to food banks.
Cuts to PIP have NOTHING to do with increasing employment. Purely for short-term savings. Likely to damage employment goals.
March 19, 2025 at 2:51 PM
TLDR:
Positive reforms totally outweighed by massive cuts to incomes for disabled people & carers.
Will cause serious hardship & risk people forced to turn to food banks.
Cuts to PIP have NOTHING to do with increasing employment. Purely for short-term savings. Likely to damage employment goals.
Positive reforms totally outweighed by massive cuts to incomes for disabled people & carers.
Will cause serious hardship & risk people forced to turn to food banks.
Cuts to PIP have NOTHING to do with increasing employment. Purely for short-term savings. Likely to damage employment goals.
Reposted by Sue
And certain families will face big income reductions: for example, those who lose entitlement to both PIP (due to tighter eligibility criteria) and UC-health (when the Work Capability Assessment is scrapped and PIP receipt is used instead) could lose out by £9,600 per year in 2029-30.
March 19, 2025 at 6:14 PM
And certain families will face big income reductions: for example, those who lose entitlement to both PIP (due to tighter eligibility criteria) and UC-health (when the Work Capability Assessment is scrapped and PIP receipt is used instead) could lose out by £9,600 per year in 2029-30.
Reposted by Sue
