@sugoiknight.bsky.social
ah you'll notice I didn't say "just" figure it out there, did I. I'm not accusing arch users of refusing to do anything at all, I'm accusing many of them of seeing themselves as better than other people because they went through a process that would be totally unnecessary on any other distro
December 10, 2025 at 5:14 PM
ah you'll notice I didn't say "just" figure it out there, did I. I'm not accusing arch users of refusing to do anything at all, I'm accusing many of them of seeing themselves as better than other people because they went through a process that would be totally unnecessary on any other distro
that's an elitist and unhelpful attitude though lol. like that's exactly what I'm describing. arch is annoying and obtuse and big chunks of the community think they're better than you because they were able to figure it out, and if you're not that must be your fault somehow
December 10, 2025 at 4:42 PM
that's an elitist and unhelpful attitude though lol. like that's exactly what I'm describing. arch is annoying and obtuse and big chunks of the community think they're better than you because they were able to figure it out, and if you're not that must be your fault somehow
hey now in fairness this is mostly a statistics issue. most linux communities are pretty friendly, the average is just getting thrown off by archlinux georg,
December 9, 2025 at 2:29 AM
hey now in fairness this is mostly a statistics issue. most linux communities are pretty friendly, the average is just getting thrown off by archlinux georg,
> For it to be impossible to block them all on Twitter, there would have to be hoards of them
yes
> that wildly outnumber us
no, you came up with this, nobody else did
yes
> that wildly outnumber us
no, you came up with this, nobody else did
October 27, 2025 at 12:03 AM
> For it to be impossible to block them all on Twitter, there would have to be hoards of them
yes
> that wildly outnumber us
no, you came up with this, nobody else did
yes
> that wildly outnumber us
no, you came up with this, nobody else did
if every nazi on twitter decides to make themselves your problem specifically, that is a huge number of people who are now your problem, even though nazis are radically outnumbered by not-nazis in our society. honestly seems really straightforward to me
October 26, 2025 at 8:40 PM
if every nazi on twitter decides to make themselves your problem specifically, that is a huge number of people who are now your problem, even though nazis are radically outnumbered by not-nazis in our society. honestly seems really straightforward to me
you didn't add any context here you just repeated your point again. so i'll repeat mine: the statements "they thrive by projecting the idea that they are more numerous than you are (even though they aren't)" and "there are still a lot of them" are completely compatible
October 26, 2025 at 8:35 PM
you didn't add any context here you just repeated your point again. so i'll repeat mine: the statements "they thrive by projecting the idea that they are more numerous than you are (even though they aren't)" and "there are still a lot of them" are completely compatible
man this is just a really dishonest way to argue. you can see "more numerous" isn't the only thing in the sentence, and it's pretty obvious how "they try to seem like the majority even though they aren't" and "there are still a lot of these people out there" are both fine things to say
October 25, 2025 at 8:24 PM
man this is just a really dishonest way to argue. you can see "more numerous" isn't the only thing in the sentence, and it's pretty obvious how "they try to seem like the majority even though they aren't" and "there are still a lot of these people out there" are both fine things to say
But AI doesn't let you express anything, right. It lets you ask a computer to do it. The artistic input you have is the prompt and the settings, and that's much more programming than art anyway, just using pseudo-natural language instead of code. What are you actually expressing there
October 14, 2025 at 4:40 AM
But AI doesn't let you express anything, right. It lets you ask a computer to do it. The artistic input you have is the prompt and the settings, and that's much more programming than art anyway, just using pseudo-natural language instead of code. What are you actually expressing there
I hope this little moment of being spiteful on bluesky was worth never being taken seriously ever again
September 30, 2025 at 10:50 AM
I hope this little moment of being spiteful on bluesky was worth never being taken seriously ever again
dishonest to pretend that if they used more precise language you would have taken them any more seriously than you did
August 5, 2025 at 7:43 PM
dishonest to pretend that if they used more precise language you would have taken them any more seriously than you did
I'm going to be honest with you man, you seem pretty unstable and completely disconnected from reality at this point. I think your emotions are getting the better of you and you can't really think straight about this stuff any more. so I'm done talking to you
August 5, 2025 at 7:30 PM
I'm going to be honest with you man, you seem pretty unstable and completely disconnected from reality at this point. I think your emotions are getting the better of you and you can't really think straight about this stuff any more. so I'm done talking to you
so this is getting embarrassing, right?
me: people tend to believe what they see in media even if they intellectually understand it's not real
your reading of this: people believe media and can't tell it from reality
like you literally took the opposite reading of what I said
me: people tend to believe what they see in media even if they intellectually understand it's not real
your reading of this: people believe media and can't tell it from reality
like you literally took the opposite reading of what I said
August 5, 2025 at 7:30 PM
so this is getting embarrassing, right?
me: people tend to believe what they see in media even if they intellectually understand it's not real
your reading of this: people believe media and can't tell it from reality
like you literally took the opposite reading of what I said
me: people tend to believe what they see in media even if they intellectually understand it's not real
your reading of this: people believe media and can't tell it from reality
like you literally took the opposite reading of what I said
it says media reinforces incorrect ideas about sexual violence, which is true, because people tend to believe what they see in media even if they intellectually understand it's not real.
so I'm accusing you of having poor reading comprehension because you clearly did not understand this quote
so I'm accusing you of having poor reading comprehension because you clearly did not understand this quote
August 5, 2025 at 6:43 PM
it says media reinforces incorrect ideas about sexual violence, which is true, because people tend to believe what they see in media even if they intellectually understand it's not real.
so I'm accusing you of having poor reading comprehension because you clearly did not understand this quote
so I'm accusing you of having poor reading comprehension because you clearly did not understand this quote
it's not an ad hominem though, I genuinely think you didn't properly read either the quotes you posted or the thing I wrote, because you seem to have fully misunderstood both.
sarkeesian wasn't calling for censorship and your quote from her doesn't say anything about media normalising actions
sarkeesian wasn't calling for censorship and your quote from her doesn't say anything about media normalising actions
August 5, 2025 at 6:42 PM
it's not an ad hominem though, I genuinely think you didn't properly read either the quotes you posted or the thing I wrote, because you seem to have fully misunderstood both.
sarkeesian wasn't calling for censorship and your quote from her doesn't say anything about media normalising actions
sarkeesian wasn't calling for censorship and your quote from her doesn't say anything about media normalising actions
so based on your various responses to my posts here I think you actually just can't read
August 5, 2025 at 4:05 PM
so based on your various responses to my posts here I think you actually just can't read
genuinely interested to hear how you reached this point because, to me, it seems like even a child's level of critical thinking would make it really obvious how stupid this point you keep trying to make is
July 31, 2025 at 5:34 PM
genuinely interested to hear how you reached this point because, to me, it seems like even a child's level of critical thinking would make it really obvious how stupid this point you keep trying to make is
like did you personally choose these quotes so they would be as free from context as possible or did someone else do the thinking for you. have you noticed they don't say the same thing as each other at all. did you just see keywords and go yep these are the same
July 31, 2025 at 5:33 PM
like did you personally choose these quotes so they would be as free from context as possible or did someone else do the thinking for you. have you noticed they don't say the same thing as each other at all. did you just see keywords and go yep these are the same
you posted this in these replies multiple times and I really wonder what point you're trying to make. Yes, if you clip out a tiny portion of what collective shout are saying, you can make it sound like a small portion of what sarkeesian once said. what do you think that proves
July 31, 2025 at 5:33 PM
you posted this in these replies multiple times and I really wonder what point you're trying to make. Yes, if you clip out a tiny portion of what collective shout are saying, you can make it sound like a small portion of what sarkeesian once said. what do you think that proves
why do you think anita sarkeesian went to the UN to demand they ban video games. do you know that didn't happen. who told you it did happen, because they lied to you
July 31, 2025 at 5:17 PM
why do you think anita sarkeesian went to the UN to demand they ban video games. do you know that didn't happen. who told you it did happen, because they lied to you
> You started this mess. You went to the U.N. and started a massive campaign to censor games for "inappropriate content".
she made a web series about how games had kind of fucked up attitudes towards women and ended up going to the UN about the insane harassment she received. you are wrong
she made a web series about how games had kind of fucked up attitudes towards women and ended up going to the UN about the insane harassment she received. you are wrong
July 31, 2025 at 5:12 PM
> You started this mess. You went to the U.N. and started a massive campaign to censor games for "inappropriate content".
she made a web series about how games had kind of fucked up attitudes towards women and ended up going to the UN about the insane harassment she received. you are wrong
she made a web series about how games had kind of fucked up attitudes towards women and ended up going to the UN about the insane harassment she received. you are wrong
you're going round in circles now and I'm not coming with you so have fun with this
June 24, 2025 at 10:26 PM
you're going round in circles now and I'm not coming with you so have fun with this
"if I construct a purely theoretical thought experiment that I freely acknowledge is practically impossible with the express goal of stripping away everything that disagrees with me, you'll find I actually turn out to be correct" that's true. not really useful though is it
June 24, 2025 at 10:26 PM
"if I construct a purely theoretical thought experiment that I freely acknowledge is practically impossible with the express goal of stripping away everything that disagrees with me, you'll find I actually turn out to be correct" that's true. not really useful though is it
like if my grandmother had wheels she would be a bicycle
June 24, 2025 at 10:24 PM
like if my grandmother had wheels she would be a bicycle
sure yeah you got me there. if a human being were somehow able to exist in a void without receiving any sensory input or doing anything like eating or breathing or sleeping, they certainly would behave like an LLM in many ways. do you see how that's kind of a stupid thing to say though
June 24, 2025 at 10:24 PM
sure yeah you got me there. if a human being were somehow able to exist in a void without receiving any sensory input or doing anything like eating or breathing or sleeping, they certainly would behave like an LLM in many ways. do you see how that's kind of a stupid thing to say though