Suki van Dijk ❌👑
banner
sukivandijk.bsky.social
Suki van Dijk ❌👑
@sukivandijk.bsky.social
writer, knitter, yogi, wife, mom, semi-professional smartass. owned by dogs. lucky. Don’t DM me. I'm not buying anything. 💙🤷🏼‍♀️🇺🇸
Reposted by Suki van Dijk ❌👑
Yes, it’s one they handpicked, and IIRC is actually a judge in management who only hears a small number of cases. It’s so flagrantly corrupt and a perversion of due process you almost have to laugh; then go off and file a bar complaint against the judge for violating ethics rules.
Isn't it a completely different immigration judge than the one from years earlier? How can they claim a "scriveners error" from someone else's order?
December 12, 2025 at 1:30 PM
Reposted by Suki van Dijk ❌👑
Anyway, a very good FOIA to file this morning would be for all emails and calls received in the last 24 hours by the immigration “judge” who issued the order.
December 12, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Reposted by Suki van Dijk ❌👑
It is not! A “scrivener’s error” is for things like fixing typos or very minor non-material errors, not retroactively adding a deportation order that doesn’t current exist!
Is "correcting" a previous order like this a real thing?
December 12, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Reposted by Suki van Dijk ❌👑
The immigration “judge” allegedly sua sponte — meaning without any request by a party, which is obviously a lie given the circumstances — “corrected” the 2019 order to fix a “scrivener’s error” and order Mr Abrego Garcia deported.

Not surprisingly, Judge Xinis blocked that. What a corrupt act.
December 12, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Reposted by Suki van Dijk ❌👑
December 9, 2025 at 11:34 AM
And we TOLD you so!!!!
December 10, 2025 at 12:17 AM
Why would you (incorrectly spell, and) single out Israel?
December 10, 2025 at 12:15 AM