Surendra Balraadjsing
banner
surendrab.bsky.social
Surendra Balraadjsing
@surendrab.bsky.social
🎓 PhD at Leiden University
🔍 Research focuses on #ecotoxicology, #nanomaterials and computational toxicology ( #machinelearning )

ResearchGate: researchgate.net/profile/Surendra-Balraadjsing
ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2167-8163
Twitter/X: @surendrab_
New paper out: doi.org/10.1016/j.im...

Here we created a QSPR for the prediction of nanomaterial ion release (particle dissolution).

We also investigated what effect artifically increasing datasets has on machine learning models.
February 10, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Reposted by Surendra Balraadjsing
What works:
- publisher site link
- preprint server link
- DOI / PMID / URN / SSRN / RePec / ArXiv link

What doesn’t work:
- shortlinks like bitly (DOI.org’s own service works)
- uploading the pdf to bsky
- hosting your work on your blog and sharing it from there
- deleting the link then posting
Home Page
DOI.org
December 7, 2024 at 8:39 AM
In doi.org/10.1016/j.en... we also highlight the importance of model evaluation and going beyond the OECD principles.

Applicability domain results can at times over- or underestimate prediction reliability.

Finally, it also shows how larger dataset sizes do not improve nano-QSAR performance
November 27, 2024 at 5:56 PM
In doi.org/10.1016/j.en... + doi.org/10.1021/acs.... we expanded the idea of traditional QSARs by including species characteristic or ecological information to make them applicable to multiple species instead of just one
Redirecting
doi.org
November 27, 2024 at 5:54 PM
Variables related to the exposure conditions were largely unimportant. This is probably due to the lack of variance in exposure conditions (the experiments were largely standardized, so things like pH, temperature etc. were almost always the same)
November 27, 2024 at 7:58 AM
We found that all ML algorithms performed pretty well but the tree based method (random forest) was the best. Identifying variables of importance led to mixed results that depended per model. In general, the molecular descriptors and p-chem properties scored high in importance
November 27, 2024 at 7:58 AM
Most nano-QSARs focus on in vitro endpoints (because more data is available) but to a lesser extent on in vivo endpoints. The aim here was to look how different ML algorithms would perform on in vivo endpoints and identify important variables for nanotoxicity prediction
November 27, 2024 at 7:57 AM
In doi.org/10.1016/j.ch..., we collected Daphnia magna nanotoxicity data from literature based on standardized lab experiments and created classification nano-QSARs
Redirecting
doi.org
November 27, 2024 at 7:57 AM
Will we only find out which it is by opening the (black) box (model)?
November 25, 2024 at 7:35 PM