Actually, I'd delete patriarchy, which would have the same effect and much besides, including eradicating the destructive notion that humans can transcend material reality and the attendant physical limitations.
December 10, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Actually, I'd delete patriarchy, which would have the same effect and much besides, including eradicating the destructive notion that humans can transcend material reality and the attendant physical limitations.
It's only possible to believe that women having rights in law as women is "incoherent" if you can't conceive of women having rights independent of what's convenient to men.
Really, you should read the judgment yourself rather than rely on so-called "expert" opinion.
Really, you should read the judgment yourself rather than rely on so-called "expert" opinion.
December 8, 2025 at 12:41 PM
It's only possible to believe that women having rights in law as women is "incoherent" if you can't conceive of women having rights independent of what's convenient to men.
Really, you should read the judgment yourself rather than rely on so-called "expert" opinion.
Really, you should read the judgment yourself rather than rely on so-called "expert" opinion.
The UK has "sorted it out" by means of this case. It has clarified that "sex" can only mean sex if the protection against discrimination the EA2010 is intended to confer is to work. The rights of all women & all same sex attracted people depend on this.
December 8, 2025 at 12:21 PM
The UK has "sorted it out" by means of this case. It has clarified that "sex" can only mean sex if the protection against discrimination the EA2010 is intended to confer is to work. The rights of all women & all same sex attracted people depend on this.
If you had read the judgment, you would see that both of these issues are addressed.
There is absolutely nothing incoherent in the view that women are female, are discriminated against on the basis of sex and that protection against discrimination must therefore also be based on sex.
There is absolutely nothing incoherent in the view that women are female, are discriminated against on the basis of sex and that protection against discrimination must therefore also be based on sex.
December 8, 2025 at 12:08 PM
If you had read the judgment, you would see that both of these issues are addressed.
There is absolutely nothing incoherent in the view that women are female, are discriminated against on the basis of sex and that protection against discrimination must therefore also be based on sex.
There is absolutely nothing incoherent in the view that women are female, are discriminated against on the basis of sex and that protection against discrimination must therefore also be based on sex.
But it didn't do either of those things.
December 8, 2025 at 11:55 AM
But it didn't do either of those things.
You misunderstood. "Definitely nope" was about your previous response.
This has been fun, if you like that sort of thing but I'm done with you.
This has been fun, if you like that sort of thing but I'm done with you.
December 4, 2025 at 5:38 PM
You misunderstood. "Definitely nope" was about your previous response.
This has been fun, if you like that sort of thing but I'm done with you.
This has been fun, if you like that sort of thing but I'm done with you.
If that were true, no one would now be tantrumming about boys who say they are girls now being excluded.
And yet here you are.
And yet here you are.
December 4, 2025 at 5:33 PM
If that were true, no one would now be tantrumming about boys who say they are girls now being excluded.
And yet here you are.
And yet here you are.
Not when they allowed boys who said they were girls to join.
December 4, 2025 at 3:14 PM
Not when they allowed boys who said they were girls to join.
You can't prove the existence of "gender identity" using a study that takes its existence as read.
December 4, 2025 at 3:04 PM
You can't prove the existence of "gender identity" using a study that takes its existence as read.
A girl only organisation is one that is only for girls. It should be for all girls, of course, but it has to exclude all boys, or it's not what it claims to be.
December 4, 2025 at 3:02 PM
A girl only organisation is one that is only for girls. It should be for all girls, of course, but it has to exclude all boys, or it's not what it claims to be.
I'm pretty sure it is
December 4, 2025 at 8:32 AM
I'm pretty sure it is
I dont think that proves what you think. It takes the existence of GI as a given but then talks about potential prenatal mechanisms that might produce an individual who believes they are the other sex. I haven't read it all. Did they control for sexual orientation?
December 4, 2025 at 8:32 AM
I dont think that proves what you think. It takes the existence of GI as a given but then talks about potential prenatal mechanisms that might produce an individual who believes they are the other sex. I haven't read it all. Did they control for sexual orientation?
If they did, this would not be happening
December 4, 2025 at 8:14 AM
If they did, this would not be happening
If you're going to suggest that a lack of noisy complaints indicates contentedness, I'll have something to say about female socialisation in a world where 2-3 women/wk are killed by men (UK). But, anyway, yes. Also, not the main point. Unlawful discrimination is unlawful even when popular.
December 4, 2025 at 8:13 AM
If you're going to suggest that a lack of noisy complaints indicates contentedness, I'll have something to say about female socialisation in a world where 2-3 women/wk are killed by men (UK). But, anyway, yes. Also, not the main point. Unlawful discrimination is unlawful even when popular.
The girls are fine. They have their girl only org back.
December 3, 2025 at 10:09 PM
The girls are fine. They have their girl only org back.
If an organisation for girls being only for girls upsets you, leave and set up your own.
Ofc, to be legally compliant, you'd have to open it to both sexes.
Ofc, to be legally compliant, you'd have to open it to both sexes.
December 3, 2025 at 2:29 PM
If an organisation for girls being only for girls upsets you, leave and set up your own.
Ofc, to be legally compliant, you'd have to open it to both sexes.
Ofc, to be legally compliant, you'd have to open it to both sexes.