Rails, JavaScript, architecture, product.
Less caching. Fewer bugs. Simpler code.
If you’re still on AMS because “it works,” benchmark Alba on your heaviest model.
syedaslam.com/posts/escapi...
Less caching. Fewer bugs. Simpler code.
If you’re still on AMS because “it works,” benchmark Alba on your heaviest model.
syedaslam.com/posts/escapi...
• AMS with caching: ~3,500 ops/sec
• Alba (Oj backend, no caching): ~2,800 ops/sec
→ ~4-5x faster than uncached AMS
This changed our thinking.
• AMS with caching: ~3,500 ops/sec
• Alba (Oj backend, no caching): ~2,800 ops/sec
→ ~4-5x faster than uncached AMS
This changed our thinking.
We benchmarked our heaviest real endpoint: an e-commerce order with ~100 shipments, ~100 line items, and deep associations.
We benchmarked our heaviest real endpoint: an e-commerce order with ~100 shipments, ~100 line items, and deep associations.