But the newer heliocentric model explained retrograde motion as a *natural consequence*, or a *prediction*, of our (and the other planets') motion around the Sun: 🧪 (3/3)

youtu.be/m5QXoFaTN1I?...

The ancient geocentric model invented new (real) motions, like planets following circles superimposed on other circles, in order to explain it: 🧪 (2/3)

youtu.be/KT3PmGVf6DU?...

Heliocentric models explained this as a *natural consequence* of the model, which is more aesthetic:
(3/3)
youtu.be/m5QXoFaTN1I?...

There was an explanation in the old geocentric system involving inventing motion around circles superimposed on other circles to explain it: (2/3)
youtu.be/KT3PmGVf6DU?...

it me

There is an *information* gap that is seemingly impossible to bridge since one side imagines that they are constrained by rules, decency, and prior custom, and the other recognizes none of those things; the commodity is volume and repitition, and the complicit media sets themselves up to allow it.

What did people complain about? Higher prices. What did GOP promise? Lower prices. What is the effect of blanket tariffs and deportation of low-wage workers? Higher prices. What will happen? Lies about the consequences of their actions, nobody hears otherwise in their silos, and we'll start again.

Physics and astronomy!

Trying to enforce what people choose to do after leaving public ed doesn't sound super conservative.

It's a moral imperative