By @GaryWinslett
By @GaryWinslett
Translation: they know it was a mess. But we still do not know the full scale and impacts.
Translation: they know it was a mess. But we still do not know the full scale and impacts.
• $1.5M per call for China-built ships
• $1M if a carrier owns just one China-built vessel
• $1M for Chinese state-owned ships
• Potentially stackable
It’s unclear what will be implemented, but the uncertainty alone is already hurting trade.
• $1.5M per call for China-built ships
• $1M if a carrier owns just one China-built vessel
• $1M for Chinese state-owned ships
• Potentially stackable
It’s unclear what will be implemented, but the uncertainty alone is already hurting trade.
Maritime protectionism has failed for 100 years. It didn't build us a fleet. It won't now. But the USTR's originally proposed fees of up to $1.5M per port call on Chinese ships will raise prices, shrink exports, and creates more chaos for U.S. businesses. 🧵
Maritime protectionism has failed for 100 years. It didn't build us a fleet. It won't now. But the USTR's originally proposed fees of up to $1.5M per port call on Chinese ships will raise prices, shrink exports, and creates more chaos for U.S. businesses. 🧵
Recent polling from @EchelonInsights shows voter concerns shifting:
📉 Immigration fell to #4
📈 Cost of living, jobs & economy took the top spots
That’s an opening for Dems—if they take it.
Recent polling from @EchelonInsights shows voter concerns shifting:
📉 Immigration fell to #4
📈 Cost of living, jobs & economy took the top spots
That’s an opening for Dems—if they take it.
Trump’s movement? The opposite. Constant visibility, spectacle-driven engagement—even negative press fuels them.
Trump’s movement? The opposite. Constant visibility, spectacle-driven engagement—even negative press fuels them.