taloff.bsky.social
@taloff.bsky.social
Reposted
The justices "knew" who belonged and who didn't, and simply reached for whatever rationale would allow them to get the result they wanted.

One year, "science" trumped a common sense argument.

The next, "common sense" trumped claims of science.

Pretty damn Caucasian, actually.
December 11, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Reposted
The very next year, SCOTUS heard US v Thind, in which a South Asian Sikh insisted he was technically part of the Caucasian race based on language and anthropology etc.

The court said, ha ha, no, by "Caucasian" we mean white.
December 11, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Reposted
In the 1922 case of US v Ozawa, a Japanese immigrant to the US essentially pointed to the color of his skin and said, look, I'm white, I should be eligible for naturalization.

But the court, embracing the new "science" of race, said, no, by white we mean "Caucasian"
December 11, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Reposted
November 16, 2025 at 3:10 PM