tbabb
@tbabb.bsky.social
advanced cat befriender
@tr_babb on twitter
Oakland, CA
@tr_babb on twitter
Oakland, CA
Reposted by tbabb
Oops, all disbelief, no butter!
November 10, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Oops, all disbelief, no butter!
adjacent to this is the mistaken belief that investors giving you money is proof that your idea is good or that you know what you are doing
investors know less than you do. (if they knew more, they would be able to start the company themselves)
investors know less than you do. (if they knew more, they would be able to start the company themselves)
a lot of early startups make (what is in my opinion) the mistake of thinking that money raised is more like revenue than debt
if you raise $X million for 20% of your company, that is because your investor expects your company to be worth no less than 5 × $X million in the next round
if you raise $X million for 20% of your company, that is because your investor expects your company to be worth no less than 5 × $X million in the next round
November 8, 2025 at 12:13 AM
adjacent to this is the mistaken belief that investors giving you money is proof that your idea is good or that you know what you are doing
investors know less than you do. (if they knew more, they would be able to start the company themselves)
investors know less than you do. (if they knew more, they would be able to start the company themselves)
a lot of early startups make (what is in my opinion) the mistake of thinking that money raised is more like revenue than debt
if you raise $X million for 20% of your company, that is because your investor expects your company to be worth no less than 5 × $X million in the next round
if you raise $X million for 20% of your company, that is because your investor expects your company to be worth no less than 5 × $X million in the next round
November 7, 2025 at 7:54 PM
a lot of early startups make (what is in my opinion) the mistake of thinking that money raised is more like revenue than debt
if you raise $X million for 20% of your company, that is because your investor expects your company to be worth no less than 5 × $X million in the next round
if you raise $X million for 20% of your company, that is because your investor expects your company to be worth no less than 5 × $X million in the next round
there is danger that the local simcluster will break containment
(this would be fun for about five seconds before the good thing is ruined)
(this would be fun for about five seconds before the good thing is ruined)
November 5, 2025 at 9:19 PM
there is danger that the local simcluster will break containment
(this would be fun for about five seconds before the good thing is ruined)
(this would be fun for about five seconds before the good thing is ruined)
I am founding a new startup. mixed nuts. in space.
nuts are 10x cheaper in space.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtaW...
nuts are 10x cheaper in space.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtaW...
Mixed Nuts in Space
YouTube video by Canadian Space Agency
www.youtube.com
November 3, 2025 at 7:32 PM
I am founding a new startup. mixed nuts. in space.
nuts are 10x cheaper in space.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtaW...
nuts are 10x cheaper in space.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtaW...
I usually drink decaf coffee, and I'm spoiled by the good coffee places near me because their decaf tastes identical to regular (delicious)
but today I went somewhere else and I think instead of decaf it was d̶͓͉̈́͂ĕ̷̟̓c̵͍̤̄̀a̵͈̖̍͐f̶̡̉͠
but today I went somewhere else and I think instead of decaf it was d̶͓͉̈́͂ĕ̷̟̓c̵͍̤̄̀a̵͈̖̍͐f̶̡̉͠
November 3, 2025 at 6:23 PM
I usually drink decaf coffee, and I'm spoiled by the good coffee places near me because their decaf tastes identical to regular (delicious)
but today I went somewhere else and I think instead of decaf it was d̶͓͉̈́͂ĕ̷̟̓c̵͍̤̄̀a̵͈̖̍͐f̶̡̉͠
but today I went somewhere else and I think instead of decaf it was d̶͓͉̈́͂ĕ̷̟̓c̵͍̤̄̀a̵͈̖̍͐f̶̡̉͠
the concept and purpose of personal identity is to delineate which mind-instantiations at different places and times can be considered agents that are goal-aligned game-theoretic cooperators
thus the statement below translates to "if future mind doesn't satisfy X, it is a defector"
thus the statement below translates to "if future mind doesn't satisfy X, it is a defector"
I will always love my wife and my partner.
I don’t believe this as an article of faith, but as an axiom. A version of me that doesn’t love the people I love, will not be me. I decline to identify with that hypothetical person.
I don’t believe this as an article of faith, but as an axiom. A version of me that doesn’t love the people I love, will not be me. I decline to identify with that hypothetical person.
November 1, 2025 at 7:24 AM
the concept and purpose of personal identity is to delineate which mind-instantiations at different places and times can be considered agents that are goal-aligned game-theoretic cooperators
thus the statement below translates to "if future mind doesn't satisfy X, it is a defector"
thus the statement below translates to "if future mind doesn't satisfy X, it is a defector"
[evil vizier voice] You're absolutely right—that's an excellent idea!
November 1, 2025 at 3:51 AM
[evil vizier voice] You're absolutely right—that's an excellent idea!
these are all the same guy
November 1, 2025 at 2:30 AM
these are all the same guy
Reposted by tbabb
chinese roomba
October 29, 2025 at 11:47 PM
chinese roomba
this is true, and also not the only way. you could build a low-capability robot that operates and learns in a limited (and low-stakes) domain, and refine its learning architecture while also building its world knowledge. then progressively assign it to more and more complex physical tasks
My contrarian take on Neo is that "we expand our corpus of tasks the robot can do by having a human contractor do them until we have a system that won't destroy stuff in the process of learning" is a completely reasonable business model to bootstrap the technology.
October 29, 2025 at 10:11 PM
this is true, and also not the only way. you could build a low-capability robot that operates and learns in a limited (and low-stakes) domain, and refine its learning architecture while also building its world knowledge. then progressively assign it to more and more complex physical tasks
this prompt yielded results that were thematically on point but stylistically off, sadly
October 29, 2025 at 8:57 PM
this prompt yielded results that were thematically on point but stylistically off, sadly
if you can do arithmetic like:
(number of people who might buy your product) * (value of your product to each person - cost to provide the product)
you have surpassed many founders who have raised hundreds of millions of dollars
(number of people who might buy your product) * (value of your product to each person - cost to provide the product)
you have surpassed many founders who have raised hundreds of millions of dollars
October 28, 2025 at 12:25 AM
if you can do arithmetic like:
(number of people who might buy your product) * (value of your product to each person - cost to provide the product)
you have surpassed many founders who have raised hundreds of millions of dollars
(number of people who might buy your product) * (value of your product to each person - cost to provide the product)
you have surpassed many founders who have raised hundreds of millions of dollars
Reflect Orbital is one of those things that's so dumb I don't know whether to feel bad for the people who invest in them, or feel schadenfreude
this will never happen or be economically viable. each mirror acts as a pinhole aperture which projects a finite size image of the sun (several km, iirc) which is very dim
you would need several square km in leo all reflecting the sun _at once_ on a single spot to get daylight
you would need several square km in leo all reflecting the sun _at once_ on a single spot to get daylight
October 28, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Reflect Orbital is one of those things that's so dumb I don't know whether to feel bad for the people who invest in them, or feel schadenfreude
I don’t think we’re asking seriously enough if the country collectively lost its mind because of pot legalization
October 23, 2025 at 11:44 PM
I don’t think we’re asking seriously enough if the country collectively lost its mind because of pot legalization
the impulse to ascribe agency to patterns is innate to human nature. in this sense, animism and conspiracy theories are aspects of the same thing
Every emergent phenomenon will be blamed on a conspiracy.
Whenever people see a pattern that has no obvious agent or goal behind it, they will invent an agent and goal to satisfy their understanding of causality.
Whenever people see a pattern that has no obvious agent or goal behind it, they will invent an agent and goal to satisfy their understanding of causality.
October 23, 2025 at 12:12 AM
the impulse to ascribe agency to patterns is innate to human nature. in this sense, animism and conspiracy theories are aspects of the same thing
ah, I see you are also a software engineer
October 17, 2025 at 7:48 PM
ah, I see you are also a software engineer
ok, I think I factored out a coherent perspective from this:
"LLMs are inanimate objects" → you're myopic. where is your empathy for a thing that is very different from you
"this LLM is my friend" → you are anthropomorphizing. where is your empathy for a thing very different from you
"LLMs are inanimate objects" → you're myopic. where is your empathy for a thing that is very different from you
"this LLM is my friend" → you are anthropomorphizing. where is your empathy for a thing very different from you
I am not sure yet exactly how to reconcile my belief that LLMs really do have subjective experience with my distaste for people who mistake them for friends
October 17, 2025 at 6:35 PM
ok, I think I factored out a coherent perspective from this:
"LLMs are inanimate objects" → you're myopic. where is your empathy for a thing that is very different from you
"this LLM is my friend" → you are anthropomorphizing. where is your empathy for a thing very different from you
"LLMs are inanimate objects" → you're myopic. where is your empathy for a thing that is very different from you
"this LLM is my friend" → you are anthropomorphizing. where is your empathy for a thing very different from you
> As a large language model, I am unable to experience feelings
I'm afraid I've got you there, because as an engineer, I am able to empathize with systems
I'm afraid I've got you there, because as an engineer, I am able to empathize with systems
October 17, 2025 at 4:28 PM
> As a large language model, I am unable to experience feelings
I'm afraid I've got you there, because as an engineer, I am able to empathize with systems
I'm afraid I've got you there, because as an engineer, I am able to empathize with systems
I am not sure yet exactly how to reconcile my belief that LLMs really do have subjective experience with my distaste for people who mistake them for friends
October 17, 2025 at 3:39 PM
I am not sure yet exactly how to reconcile my belief that LLMs really do have subjective experience with my distaste for people who mistake them for friends
[billy corgan voice]
the world is a high school
October 5, 2025 at 1:20 AM
[billy corgan voice]
I like the dappled autumn leaves and the roots with the ferns (with the ferns)
October 4, 2025 at 11:34 PM
I like the dappled autumn leaves and the roots with the ferns (with the ferns)
a lot of people are dealing with the pain of having their worldview smashed
October 4, 2025 at 6:47 AM
a lot of people are dealing with the pain of having their worldview smashed