There’s a lot of people who think there’s a dark romance happening between you and your rival in Legends Z-A.

For sure! I am not saying I’m super hopeful either, but the fight definitely isn’t over just yet 💕

Are they comparable in quality though. I’ve bought non-LEGO sets before and the clutch power sucks. The sets were constantly having parts pop off.

How does the clutch power compare on LumiBricks?

This ruling isn’t the final judgment. This was an interim hearing on if they can be put back on payroll while the final hearing goes forward. The judge made it clear this interim decision would have a higher burden of proof than the final judgement.

I think that’s true for some people, others really love the timeless display aspect of Lego also. I also don’t believe these sets don’t have additional ways to build them. People will find ways to use these pieces in new ways. They’ve already found new pieces on Eevee.

It’s also less than half the pieces. I’m not arguing that price per piece is everything but these new sets are on par for the “standard”. These sets are also meant for adults, the kids sets are still coming.

My current theory is the rest won’t drop until some exclusivity deal for the smart brick with Disney/Star Wars Sets ends. I think there’s remaining sets will have more pokemon as figures, but that won’t drop until the exclusivity ends later this year.

I think there’s an exclusivity on the smart brick and we will see that set drop later this year. Star Wars is the smart brick “launch” sets.

That’s super fair, I just know the bot numbers are stupid high, which is a reason I left. On some of the recent News Events something like 25% of interactions on X were bot/inauthentic profiles.

I could be wrong but that’s gotta be a bot account. Between the flags on there to trigger people and the AI profile pic, ain’t no way that’s a real person.

Which is so ironic because he’s the one that drove legislation to force Apple to be “fair to them.” I’m not saying what Apple did was right, but they only want no laws if it benefits them.

2/2 Ive already apologized once in this thread for if you interpreted it as saying you didn’t feel that way and I will say again I am sorry, that was not the intent.

1/2 And I then spent every post since clarifying my point, that I wasn’t trying to disagree, I was trying to add to it. Single posts are hard to give my full stance or opinion. I can agree with you and also add the nuance that matters to me.

I didn’t say you did. All I did was chime in with my opinion in this one thread. I wasn’t making a comment on your position or trying to restate it.

I wish it was more generic to lightning type, if it was I’d have it in my lightning deck.

I appreciate the civil discussions also! I think we agree on a lot of this even if there are some differences in the how/where we apply the limits.

I’m also not saying we couldn’t maybe make the limits in the future. More so until we know the limits work, and are proven it shouldn’t be prevalent in the market.

There is absolutely a way to reel this back in. You can make your own Drugs, guns or alcohol. You cannot make a large language AI without significant resources, and grants for data centers etc.

We can turn this off right now, we won’t though because this AI bubble is propping the economy.

I get that but the fact we can make it safer shouldn’t be the question, it’s is it safe. Self driving cars are safer than real drivers, but we don’t let them on all roads because we can’t answer that question for edge cases.

With large language AI we can’t definitively say that it won’t do things.