I've started fire with Britch bark.

Which grows near Cattails. Which at the right time of year are very fluffy and flammable.

It'd take experimentation (non-trivial) or observation of fire (again non-trivial). But the behaviour is "simple" once found.

However warm bloodedness is non-trivial iirc.

Actually giving birth to live young is mundane as breathing air.

Both have evolved multiple times and the systems migrated back and forth (we're likely lung fish that went back into the rivers then back onto the land and just about gave up swapping about).

Same for "freedom". :(

Lol, point whooshed.

Fair but isn't it impolite to call a lady a cupboard?

I am ready. But I think I was born different...

Photocopiers replaced millions of jobs. But enabled millions more.

Regulation is good though. Again, lead with your good foot.

Ah nice, wow. That's the great thing about realistic kit bashes. You don't get Star Trek level errors. ;)

(They mixed a shuttles frame with a star ships dish)

Which means, ironically, "reality" is from both ends of epistemics, and we "live" in the middle. We learn over both domains. The "constructed" rules and the "derived" rules.

We generate "states" and sample "states" of the universe. :)

But "it works". Thus, over a *lot* of effort, we can show the statistical Turing machine equivalent implementation of Descartes "I think therefore I am", and thankfully that "machine" is sufficient enough to do other "science".

That is, while your example video/discussion is very dense in "philosophy" there's an actual computational equivalence principle at play here we're "converging" on in many domains.

Take some assumed "LLM" that is a transformer/tensor network.

It self describes via *statistics*.

Personally I just remember Saville (and a few others) and the BBC can basically fuck off for all it's worth upholding "standards"!