with the exception of infrequent piracy feed updates, this account is discontinued
n.b. this was already the case for posts directly replying to banned users. these restrictions do not apply to replies/quotes by certified pirates.
n.b. this was already the case for posts directly replying to banned users. these restrictions do not apply to replies/quotes by certified pirates.
it took me long to admit it to myself but i didn't derive joy from it anymore, so i got rid of it. not much more to it
it took me long to admit it to myself but i didn't derive joy from it anymore, so i got rid of it. not much more to it
but if you're editing records then yeah, sidecar, i'd consider breaking cid links enough of a problem to avoid the other approach
but if you're editing records then yeah, sidecar, i'd consider breaking cid links enough of a problem to avoid the other approach
went through a bunch of my early posts and i'm not really seeing it tbh
went through a bunch of my early posts and i'm not really seeing it tbh
`||bsky.app/ipcc$replace=/(?<="countryCode":").+?(?=")/US/`
`||bsky.app/ipcc$replace=/(?<="isAgeRestrictedGeo":").+?(?=")/false/`
`||bsky.app/ipcc$replace=/(?<="countryCode":").+?(?=")/US/`
`||bsky.app/ipcc$replace=/(?<="isAgeRestrictedGeo":").+?(?=")/false/`
if Bluesky PBC wants to make users of non-policy-compliant appviews (e.g. zeppelin) invisible their only option is to make all third-party-PDS users invisible (probably making all their engineers resign), because they cannot tell which users are using which appviews
if Bluesky PBC wants to make users of non-policy-compliant appviews (e.g. zeppelin) invisible their only option is to make all third-party-PDS users invisible (probably making all their engineers resign), because they cannot tell which users are using which appviews