Steve Jankowski
@textaural.bsky.social
200 followers 270 following 150 posts
Assistant Professor in New Media Histories at UvA. Curator of Keywords for Studying Media, Culture & Information https://textaural.com/keywords/. I study Wikipedia, utopian computation, design and consensus politics, often all at once.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
textaural.bsky.social
manifesto.wiki is a statement that I think all Wikimedia researchers should read. It was composed through the hard work of many leading the field right now: Heather Ford, Bunty Avieson, Francesco Bailo, Michael Davis, Michael Falk, Sohyeon Hwang, Andrew Iliadis, Amanda Lawrence, Francesca Sidoti.
A manifesto for Wikimedia research: Critically studying Wikimedia as infrastructure
manifesto.wiki
Reposted by Steve Jankowski
merriam-webster.com
We are thrilled to announce that our NEW Large Language Model will be released on 11.18.25.
textaural.bsky.social
Or at least, killed it for now.
textaural.bsky.social
I'm sorry but as someone who studies Wikipedia for a living, Wikipedians wouldn't allow this to happen – their principled ethos would demand that they fork Wikipedia and then remove the content of the shell that was left.

When Wikimedia tried to rollout AI summaries, the community killed it.
textaural.bsky.social
A colleague of mine uses this meme for "The Internet" media.mas.to/media_attach...
textaural.bsky.social
Here's my "AI" slide from this past Monday for one course and "The Internet" for a Lecture on Tuesday (although I double-down on the stock photos).
textaural.bsky.social
Abbate, J. (2012). _Recoding gender : women's changing participation in computing_. MIT Press.

Rosner, D. (2018). _Critical fabulations : reworking the methods and margins of design_. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
textaural.bsky.social
Stevenson, M., & Kavka, M. (2025). Doing Media Research. SAGE Publications Limited.

Jørgensen, M. W. and Phillips, L. J. (2002). _Discourse analysis as theory and method_. Sage. (Especially the sections on Mouffe & Laclau)
textaural.bsky.social
Jameson, F. (2013). The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. Routledge.

Marvin, C. (1988). _When old technologies were new_. Oxford University Press New York.
textaural.bsky.social
Since grad school, I struggled to work through what discourse analysis was as a method. Inspired by a number of historians and works on method (below), here's my general model for thinking through the process.
A flowchart of Jankowski's model of discourse analysis which includes steps for inquiry, primary sources, secondary sources, contexts, interpretation of discursive practices, historization, and mediation
textaural.bsky.social
Also, did you write the ALT text? so evocative.
textaural.bsky.social
"And with that, yet another slide for his seminar on digital practices was filled."
textaural.bsky.social
As someone trained in typography, this read that tells me that academic writing knows how to use the typographic colours in the writer's toolbox 😀. But, actually we should be using MORE em dashes. clivethompson.medium.com/weird-19th-c...
Weird 19th-Century Punctuation Marks You Should Try Using
Ever heard of the “colash”? Or the “commash”?
clivethompson.medium.com
textaural.bsky.social
I think the question of what it means to teach about AI is not answerable with the smoking analogy. The amount of university investment, public concern, and critical pushback on the impact of the technology on education points to the analogy of the Web in the 1990s.
textaural.bsky.social
Which, I do understand, runs counter to the requests of the open letter.
textaural.bsky.social
The assignment also compares these tasks with what Google and Wikipedia also produces. Both of which are useful, both of which are limited and problematic in their own ways. So I'm asking students to use an LLM chatbot.
textaural.bsky.social
I had not seen this. And I will say I am currently conflicted as I fall in the "critical technical practice" crowd, and I've designed an assignment to demonstrate how an LLM chatbot malfunctions when _specific_ (not general) facts, sources, and contexts are the goal.
textaural.bsky.social
Perfect timing as I'm updating my lecture slides for the first class next week of "Digital Practices". That list of definitions will follow this slide I had for last year. Great work.
Reposted by Steve Jankowski
theverge.com
The world’s largest encyclopedia became the factual foundation of the web, but now it’s under attack.

Read more from @joshdzieza.bsky.social: www.theverge.com/cs/features/...
textaural.bsky.social
It's nice to see a piece that carefully reminds people of Wikipedia's importance and what's at stake politically and culturally. If interested, there's a lot of recent and good work exploring these ideas further. Come check out what we've been up to. meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Critica...
textaural.bsky.social
"Republicans investigate Wikipedia over allegations of organized bias" thehill.com/homenews/hou... 👀
thehill.com
textaural.bsky.social
With the school year approaching, a number of scholars and myself have assembled together a Critical Wikimedia Research Bibliography. If you are teaching a course or doing research, we think you might find some good resources here. meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Critica...
Critical Wikimedia Research Bibliography - Meta-Wiki
meta.wikimedia.org
textaural.bsky.social
Over a million views of an AI impersonation ad of Canada's prime minister. www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN7d.... Published yesterday.
Motion Daily 1
YouTube video by Life in Motion
www.youtube.com
textaural.bsky.social
It's a two-car garage obviously
textaural.bsky.social
I've read the draft guideline for researching Wikipedia's neutrality (meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Researc...) & I will add my thoughts to the discussion.

But Heather Ford has already raised a number of important concerns about it that shouldn't be ignored.
theconversation.com/wikipedias-n...
Wikipedia’s ‘neutrality’ has always been complicated. New rules will make questioning it harder
Wikipedia is built on a “neutral point of view”. But who decides what neutral means?
theconversation.com