“Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” Robert Oppenheimer, Bhagavad Gita

That is both terrifying and fascinating.

Jesus was White.

Have them learn how to do proper GPT prompting like zero-shot and chain-of-thought and then cross compare multiple research articles to compare and determine best article fit for research, etc.

Ex: Give an open ended question, have AI solve, then solve by hand. What did AI miss? Or vice versa.

Make it okay but require method disclosure so they’re comfortable admitting it.

Have them work in groups with multiple stages so they peer monitor.

It’s no longer possible. Even the “researched” AI detectors are known to falsely report positives and negatives.

I’m moving to working with my educators to focus on tasks that promote intentional decision-making about when, why, and how to use AI tools.

𝐋𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐝: WDR2018, OECD/PISA, IMF working papers, Brookings, WERD database.

Seeking insight and local country case-study data to study and compare the reform-window framework in these contexts. Ideas, data partners, or references welcome!
(3/3)

#EduSky #AcademicSky

𝐄𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠:
• India: #NEP2020, #SWAYAM, #EdTech scaling
• Brazil: #FUNDEB, #SENAI, #PRONATEC
• Indonesia: #MerdekaBelajar, #SchoolPenggerak

Linking reform windows to global shifts & domestic readiness.
(2/3)