Explore this post and more from the politics community

Chief Justice John Roberts’ court is actively eroding the separation of church and state, breaking with centuries of First Amendment jurisprudence.

The Supreme Court is once again poised to transform American law by expanding presidential power and limiting constitutional rights.

Chief Justice John Roberts’ court is actively eroding the separation of church and state, breaking with centuries of First Amendment jurisprudence.

Chief Justice John Roberts’ court is actively eroding the separation of church and state, breaking with centuries of First Amendment jurisprudence.

The Supreme Court is once again poised to transform American law by expanding presidential power and limiting constitutional rights.

Please join the Center for American Progress for a virtual event that will dive into 20 years of the Roberts court and the upcoming Supreme Court term.

Please join the Center for American Progress for a virtual event that will dive into 20 years of the Roberts court and the upcoming Supreme Court term.

By using their authority to define what corporations are—and what powers they hold—states can end the era of corporate and dark money in U.S. politics.

Wednesday's ruling in Boyle isn't the first time the Court has given precedential effect to an unsigned order, but it's the first time it tried to explain *why,* for reasons that ... fail to persuade.

American science and innovation should not be subject to the political winds of the day. Find out how the Trump administration’s grant terminations are affecting your school, your community, and your ...

Please join the Center for American Progress for a virtual event on presidential appeasement and the Supreme Court in 2025.

This term, the U.S. Supreme Court continued its deeply concerning trend of giving deference to the president over Congress and the judiciary. More cases have been filed on the “shadow docket” this year than in any other past term, and the far right-leaning justices have relied on said docket to overturn lower court rulings enjoining the Trump administration’s potentially illegal and unconstitutional actions—without touching on the merits. The high court has limited the use of nationwide injunctions on executive actions, expanded the ability of religious interests to impose their views on the public at large, eased restrictions on claims of reverse discrimination, restricted medical care for transgender youth, and further opened the courthouse doors to special interests while closing them to everyday Americans.Please join the Center for American Progress for a virtual event focusing on presidential appeasement and the Supreme Court. Our esteemed panelists will discuss all the above issues and more as we take stock of the 2024 term and prepare for another likely tumultuous term this fall.

Please join the Center for American Progress for a virtual event on presidential appeasement and the Supreme Court in 2025.

Please join the Center for American Progress for a virtual event on presidential appeasement and the Supreme Court in 2025.