theemightycage.bsky.social
@theemightycage.bsky.social
It's never "no matter what" but just "when it's not me". When you have to constantly manipulate reality to match your morals, you end up in a world that only makes sense to you.
January 22, 2026 at 4:50 PM
It's only an accessory charge that only applies when a fetus' death is caused alongside the one pregnant. It's then not about protecting the sovereignty of one's body but simply to inflict harm for harm's sake.
January 7, 2026 at 1:56 AM
When you're done screaming into a mirror, let me know.
January 2, 2026 at 2:49 AM
There are illegal abortions across many states. Feigning ignorance is more a reflection of your intelligence than mine.
January 1, 2026 at 5:58 AM
Ah, my apologies. I understand now
December 26, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Assaulting a woman that causes a miscarriage is not an abortion. I'm concerned that you think it is.
December 26, 2025 at 4:55 PM
It's not legal, not in the way I would argue, so also... no. Try again? Maybe actually engage with the argument so you know the opposing position before crashing out.
December 26, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Whataboutism isn't relevant here. I'm not arguing that legality and morality is always aligned, nice try though.
December 23, 2025 at 6:10 PM
Do you always spend your time fantasizing about what pro-choice people might say/do?
December 22, 2025 at 7:24 PM
I am able to understand their comment just fine, even with a couple typos. So, bad faith or poor reading comprehension--which is your excuse now?
December 22, 2025 at 4:24 AM
Considering I'm not the person you asked and misinterpreting authors of a post is a common problem for AI... It does seem even more likely now.
December 22, 2025 at 4:19 AM
The only way you wouldn't be able to understand that sentence from context clues is due to purposeful ignorance or.. being a bot.
December 22, 2025 at 4:14 AM
No, it's just common sense to protect the information of minors to Internet strangers. Especially the kind who are fine justifying ALL harm/trauma/harassment to women and kids if it means a baby is born.
December 22, 2025 at 4:02 AM
You don't even know what my position is, so how can it have changed?
December 22, 2025 at 4:00 AM
I asked what percentage of Medicaid dollars went to abortions, despite the Hyde Amendment forbidding it.
December 22, 2025 at 1:53 AM
No, I pointed out that your argument was in bad faith because the reasons why you say abortions are bad are almost never present. Then you tried to make your argument mine. My opinion on abortion is nothing that you've claimed thus far.
December 22, 2025 at 1:52 AM
Yes, I volunteer with organizations that work to get kids adopted. If you had any knowledge of the field you'd know I'm not at liberty to discuss any information outside of vetted potential adopters.
December 22, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Ironic to say "life saving" when those states had maternal and infant mortality more than triple.
December 21, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Weird. I know dozens of children personally waiting in the system to be adopted. All between four and six, so I find that to be suspicious.
December 21, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Such bad faith arguments... Not that I'm surprised. No, my argument doesn't hinge on the presence of cardiac cells nor does the mainstream left position.
December 21, 2025 at 11:15 PM
What percentage went to abortions vs other services? I assume you recognize the Hyde Amendment as well and why they receive funds in the first place. Specifically attacking those who can't afford healthcare is an interesting tactic.
December 21, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Also, most of PPs money comes from private donations and goes to support women in ways that no other non-profit does.
December 21, 2025 at 8:45 PM
The "baby" at the time of the vast majority of terminations has none of the things you describe minus DNA. --And cellular life with unique DNA is quite a meaningless line to draw. We kill off cellular life ALL the time, from brain dead patients to embryos in a petri dish.
December 21, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Let me guess, they went to China because they would only adopt a newborn? The list is only long for "desirable" ages/children.
December 21, 2025 at 8:41 PM
That is only true if you ignore the significant rise in self-managed abortions and the rise in neighboring states where it is legal. Overall, abortions have risen nationwide, meaning the legislation has had the exact opposite effect.
December 21, 2025 at 8:38 PM