The Glass is Empty
LightNews LightNews
theglassisempty.bsky.social
The Glass is Empty
@theglassisempty.bsky.social
580 followers 120 following 4.6K posts
I used to think the glass was half full.
Posts Replies Media Videos
theglassisempty.bsky.social
Why the assumption that it was an error?
December 12, 2025 at 9:55 AM
theglassisempty.bsky.social
Who you blaming?
December 12, 2025 at 9:20 AM
theglassisempty.bsky.social
There obviously is no point any longer.
December 9, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Reposted by The Glass is Empty
flyingrodent.bsky.social
This is why I say the British press is so much more poisonous than e.g. Fox News. Fox might be wackier and more insulting, but alternatives are available. In Britain, this is everything: all channels, all day, every day of the year. Unrelenting.
December 9, 2025 at 10:58 AM
theglassisempty.bsky.social
There is no shitty sewer that he won’t wallow in.
December 8, 2025 at 10:32 PM
theglassisempty.bsky.social
He wants views and controversy otherwise he’s a nonentity.
December 8, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Reposted by The Glass is Empty
iggyforshaw.bsky.social
December 8, 2025 at 10:00 PM
theglassisempty.bsky.social
They fucking lost on the substance.
December 8, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Reposted by The Glass is Empty
goodlawproject.org
I can't help but remember that "it" is also the word used by the man who murdered poor Brianna Ghey in a transphobic attack.

These people don't have "reasonable concerns" - they are revolting bigots.
632. A wider aspect of evidence we considered concerned an attack on her position in cross examination to the effect that she was generally transphobic, which she denied both when giving evidence initially and on recall (which is addressed further below). Some of the messages she sent are indicative of views which could be described as trans-phobic. In one dated 10 January 2024 the claimant described the second respondent as “it”. In an earlier part of the same message there is reference to the second respondent having a shadow (being in our view a reference to the appearance of stubble on the face) and a “pathetic voice”. These are disparaging remarks in relation to the second respondent in our view, because of the second respondent being a trans woman. 633. In another the second respondent is described as a “weirdo”, which the claimant sought to explain as someone acting weirdly, but which we did not accept as being what she had intended by use of that word. These remarks we consider to be consistent with other evidence of her making comments the second respondent was liable to find offensive that went beyond the simple expression of a gender critical belief, but amounted to personal attacks on the second respondent.
December 8, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Reposted by The Glass is Empty
goodlawproject.org
Oooft. Sandie Peggie shared highly offensive messages and was then "untruthful" in giving evidence to the Tribunal.

This is the 'hero' Gender Critical campaigners have chosen.
631. The third aspect was her evidence given when recalled in relation to a message she had passed on to her group of friends which related to floods in Pakistan in the most highly offensive terms. She initially described the messages as “dark humour”. Her evidence later was that the message had been sent to provoke a reaction, in broad summary. We did not consider that latter evidence to be credible given the content of the message sent and her initial evidence about it. In our view it was an untruthful attempt to downplay what she had done, which she recognised as having included very offensive material. We consider that it was clear beyond serious argument that the author or authors of the original message considered the remarks humorous, and that the claimant had also considered them humorous which was why she had passed them on. That was supported in our view by her reference to dark humour
December 8, 2025 at 2:34 PM