Roger Pielke Jr.
@thehonestbroker.bsky.social
2.9K followers 2K following 370 posts
undisciplined scholar and recovering academic @AEI @DNVA1 @CUBoulder @UCL | Subscribe to The Honest Broker ➡️ http://rogerpielkejr.substack.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
thehonestbroker.bsky.social
A bit aggressive

Let’s agree to disagree
That’s OK
Even on social media
thehonestbroker.bsky.social
Sure
Those opposed to these projects have a different view than do you

My point here is not to litigate the word “implementation” but to note that work in this area has been halted due to citizen concerns

Surely we’d agree that there has been no operational geoengineering undertaken
Reposted by Roger Pielke Jr.
jackstilgoe.bsky.social
I've been listening in to @thehonestbroker.bsky.social and others talking to congress about weather modification. The grandstanding and wilful obfuscation by some members of congress is truly 🤯. The witnesses did a good job in the circumstances rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/playing-go...
Playing God with the Weather
My testmony today in the House of Representatives
rogerpielkejr.substack.com
Reposted by Roger Pielke Jr.
ecomarci.bsky.social
Great interview with Michael Crow, president of Arizona State University. His commitment to expanding higher education access should be a model for others. youtu.be/hznzDp1BPyA?...
The Man Leading America’s “Most Innovative School” | Amanpour and Company
YouTube video by Amanpour and Company
youtu.be
Reposted by Roger Pielke Jr.
kschake.bsky.social
In this scary moment, it matters for each of us to affirm that political violence is wrong and will destroy our democracy.
thehonestbroker.bsky.social
If Curry and Koonin are to be believed, their report will respond to and revise based on the post-publication review

All of this is political, including the NCA (always has been) and increasingly, the IPCC (WG2 for a while, looks like now WG1 for AR7)

Where to go for trustworthy climate science?
thehonestbroker.bsky.social
I’d have preferred the DOE review to be called “internal review”

That said, the CWG report is certainly getting a degree of review far more intensive than any journal paper