No doubt, this can be investigated. I'd be happy to be proven wrong.

Also think we can push for holding elections as planned, validate those results, oppose changes to political norms, start a general strike, grow size of demonstration & continue building the opposition coalition.

Bottom line: there's some grain of truth in the article, as with most conspiracy theories, but the conclusions are inaccurate.

Here's my write up with some help from online search and an AI authoring tool. It has all citations from various online reporting by traditional media: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

Sure...let's investigate, but the majority of the claims in the article have already been debunked. Happy to share resources if you're interested.

As to how to move forward: you make a great point, we have to ensure our election systems are validated by 3rd parties to be working correctly.

This is a highly speculative, conspiracy-riddled, unsubstantiated article that creates more fears than connect w/ reality. Many of the points can be easily debunked by a quick search online.

Let's focus on how we move forward & ensure a democratic republic through civil disobedience instead.

I don't care who voted for whom at this point. I care that we all come together and fight the oppression.

I may be misunderstanding the article, @parkroseperma.bsky.social : It seems MSFT is doing the right thing here by dropping a firm that bowed to 47 & then picking one that's fighting 47th admin. What am I missing?

We're with you, @parkroseperma.bsky.social.