Jessica Janiuk 🏳️‍🌈
banner
thepunderwoman.com
Jessica Janiuk 🏳️‍🌈
@thepunderwoman.com
Angular Team @ Google | Nerd extraordinaire, pun aficionado, engineer, droid builder, historical fencer | #LLAP 🖖🏻
What can I say? This is my goal every time.
November 20, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Thanks for having me!
October 3, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Reposted by Jessica Janiuk 🏳️‍🌈
A huge shoutout to our amazing speakers for sharing their knowledge and inspiring talks: @ryansolid.bsky.social, @kentcdodds.com, @thepunderwoman.com, @lydiahallie.com, @thealexlichter.com, @victorsavkin.bsky.social,
@ryansolid.bsky.social, @phenomnomnomin.al, @wordman.dev, and Luca Mezzalira 👏👏👏
October 3, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Reposted by Jessica Janiuk 🏳️‍🌈
Our panelists are:

@evanyou.me - Creator of Vite
@biilmann.blog - CEO at Netlify
@ryansolid.bsky.social - Creator of SolidJS (remote)
@tannerlinsley.com - Owner at TanStack
@thepunderwoman.com - Angular Team

Hosted by @sarah11918.rainsberger.ca & @thealexlichter.com!
ViteConf
The Official in-person Vite Conference organised in collaboration with the Creator of Vite, Evan You and Vite Core Team!
viteconf.amsterdam
September 3, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Yeah, absolutely, and I know that's frustrating to not know and not have any visibility other than our comments responding that it's breaking or needs a migration.
August 21, 2025 at 7:50 AM
Sometimes we don't even know how breaking a change is at first. Many times we do, but even then it might be nuanced. Sometimes we didn't think it was breaking, land it, then find out it broke a ton, and have to roll it back. But yeah, otherwise I agree indicators would be nice.
August 20, 2025 at 8:04 PM
We do our best to communicate our reasoning, but we get some people who are very upset. We see the passion. It's not easy to say no to someone. Just know there are real people on the other end.
August 20, 2025 at 5:49 PM
The point I'm making here is that if a PR is closed, it's not because it's personal. It's also not because it's not a valuable fix. It's also not because "We just don't want to improve X, Y, or Z". We always do. We just sometimes can't, and it may not be immediately clear why to the contributor.
August 20, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Yeah, exactly the kind of thing I mean. Additionally, we WANT to land contributor PRs. We're thrilled people are contributing. We also totally recognize the passion people have for the right solution. We wish it was always as easy as approve and merge.
August 20, 2025 at 11:55 AM
We get the occasional contributor that gets upset when their issue / PR is closed, and I really wish we could show them the details of how hard it would be to land their change. We're truly not rejecting it for no reason.
August 20, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Wonderful! Always great to hear! ♥️
August 16, 2025 at 9:02 AM
Pshhh... But that requires effort... 😉
August 6, 2025 at 7:48 AM
This is also my hunch. I don't think it causes reflow. What's strange is it will return an empty array if something else has caused a recalculation of styles. It feels somewhat unsafe to use because of that.
August 5, 2025 at 3:27 PM