Thiago F. A. França
@thiago-franca.bsky.social
200 followers 470 following 110 posts
Professor of Physiology at UFFS in Brazil. Studying the physiology of behavior. Substack (em português): https://thiagofranca.substack.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
thiago-franca.bsky.social
My paper on exploring undiscovered public knowledge in neuroscience is now online at EJN, as part of a special issue on the relevance of a philosophical toolkit for neuroscience:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/author...
The text is also available as a preprint here: osf.io/preprints/ps...
Exploring undiscovered public knowledge in neuroscience
You have to enable JavaScript in your browser's settings in order to use the eReader.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Fully agree w/ the tread. I have strong reservations about using LLMs to summarize papers, organize notes, writing outlines/drafts, and finding research questions, but what strikes me the most is that people would *want* to automate these tasks. These are the tasks were we often learn new things...
thiago-franca.bsky.social
This may not be the best solution for all research questions. Depending on the hypothesis being tested, specific pubertal indicators are preferable. But the latent variable approach has the potential of being broadly applicable and to allow the production of a more coherent body of evidence.
thiago-franca.bsky.social
We argue that one way to deal with these issues when investigating pubertal effects of brain and behavior is to use a latent variable approach, combining different pubertal measures to yield more reliable and interpretable estimates. +
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Moreover, while there are strong correlations between different measures of pubertal development (eg, diff physical indicators/hormonal measures) these are far from perfect. So using different measures leads to different estimated effects, and is often unclear which measure is best in each context +
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Here we analyze the different measures currently used to assess pubertal development and to determine pubertal effects on brain and behavior. We show that interpreting such pubertal effects can be tricky because of complex relationships between pubertal measures and the physiology of puberty +
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Our paper on pubertal measures is finally out!

What do we measure when we measure pubertal development? Conceptual challenges in measuring and interpreting pubertal effects on brain and behavior

authors.elsevier.com/c/1lblI,QxXs...

A preprint is also available here: osf.io/preprints/ps... +
authors.elsevier.com
thiago-franca.bsky.social
An effort to trick AI tools *that should not be used to review papers according to pretty much everyone's policy*. The whole thing keeps going further down the cynical rabbit hole...
thiago-franca.bsky.social
...there is prediction and inference, for sure, but early processing also seems to have a very constructive nature, where it does not make sense to throw information out just yet.
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Sounds interesting, will read! I've always been skeptical of the idea of implementing predictive coding very early in sensory cortices. It does not seem to match the general workflow of sensory processing...
thiago-franca.bsky.social
I wouldn't say we have none, but wouldn't say the case is settled either, so I get your point. In any case, this was an interesting conversation. If you happen to have something written on this topic that you can share, I would very much like to read it.
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Thanks for clarifying. We are indeed on the same page regarding the definition of FW.
thiago-franca.bsky.social
OK, then I have underestimated this possibility. Still, I think the main issue stands.
bsky.app/profile/thia...
thiago-franca.bsky.social
This is theoretically sound, but I find this line of argumentation somewhat unsubstantial. No one seems to have a plausible mechanism for exploring indeterminacy to obtain FW instead of just random behavior, and none of this seem necessary to explain agency, which is the thing we know really exists.
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Of course, the whole thing also dependes on what exactly we count as free will. There are many definitions and it is easy to talk past one another...
thiago-franca.bsky.social
This is theoretically sound, but I find this line of argumentation somewhat unsubstantial. No one seems to have a plausible mechanism for exploring indeterminacy to obtain FW instead of just random behavior, and none of this seem necessary to explain agency, which is the thing we know really exists.
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Oh, yes, that is pretty much my point (though I could be wrong, of course). I was just clarifying that this point is not based on the workings of the brain specifically, but on the basic observation that quantum effects are extremely hard to maintain as systems get larger.
thiago-franca.bsky.social
Just to clarify, when I say quantum indeterminacy doesn't carry over to macro levels I say this because of particle interactions constraining quantum states, not based on mind-related considerations at all.
thiago-franca.bsky.social
...how we could possibly exploit this beyond higher level constraints that would work even in a deterministic setting. And just being able to constrain lower level dynamics does not grant an agent FW. The agent's structure as a system could be determined so as to not allow true counterfactuals. 2/2
thiago-franca.bsky.social
I think this asks too much from quantum indeterminacy. Not only there are deterministic interpretations that cannot be ruled out, but this does not seem to carry over to macro levels. Moreover, even if we take things as only probabilistically determined, it is unclear...1/
thiago-franca.bsky.social
My problem w/ this point is that I have never seen a clear definition of what is this middle ground between randomness and determinism. It seems to amount to saying the agent has causal power while being in some ill-defined state of not being causally determined nor being random.