thirdspacepolitics.bsky.social
@thirdspacepolitics.bsky.social
Reposted
Unless Democrats can promise genuine transformative change (and not just a return to a broken status quo), they will continue to lose elections.
Trump is awful. But it is not enough just to be the alternative. There must be a real vision. I am not seeing it yet.
www.pewresearch.org/politics/202...
April 15, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Reposted
Lisa Disch: "In the 19th century, a third-party vote was much more than a gesture of protest." Back then, #FusionVoting 🗳️ helped to sustain a multiparty system that was much more representative of voters’ ideologies and preferences. Learn more: centerforballotfreedom.org
February 21, 2024 at 7:30 PM
What is the fate of mass-membership political parties in the 21st century? Some commenters have argued that they are dated, as socialist and labor parties decline across much of the world, and as personality politics rise, aided by mass media and social media
April 13, 2025 at 3:29 PM
Fusion Voting Conference in Kansas!

Sadly, most states prohibit fusion voting, which lets a party exercise its right to endorse a candidate even if another party also endorses the candidate

@workingfamilies.org, @newamerica.org, @washburnuniversity.bsky.social

www.washburnlaw.edu/academics/ce...
Fusion Voting in Kansas | Washburn Law
The Robert J. Dole Center for Law and Government in partnership with New America presents Fusion Voting in Kansas: Past, Present & Future
www.washburnlaw.edu
February 27, 2025 at 3:55 PM
The two-party system is at the core of the current crisis: one of the main reasons so few Republicans will oppose Trump is because the only real opposition is the Democrats, whom they viscerally hate. If there were more than two parties fewer people would endorse everything 'their side' does
February 26, 2025 at 10:02 PM
A *real party* would have a *policy* for its elected members to implement on questions like this. (That platform could be something like: no voting to confirm any Trump nominees.)
If I were a Democrat, and I saw Trump do a purge of high-level generals who were women and people of color and wouldn't be "yes men," I wouldn't vote to advance JD Vance's college friend for Secretary of the Army.

And yet....16 Democrats just did so
February 25, 2025 at 8:47 PM
This illustrates perfectly why *pro-parties* reform is essential to fighting the far right. Germans angry at the status quo parties of the center-left and center-right have *several options* to cast a protest vote. Here, it's the old way or Trump.

@leedrutman.bsky.social
.@ClaraJeffery convinced me to put my many incoherent thoughts about the German election (and what it might tell us for US politics) into a slightly more coherent form. Warning: I cried writing this. www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
Eighty percent of Germans voted against the far right. Can that happen here?
A reminder that the small-d democratic tent is big.
www.motherjones.com
February 24, 2025 at 1:21 PM
If we had real political parties in this country, now would be a perfect time for politicking: recruiting more people to become dues-paying members, advancing platform measures like *no confirmations for any Trump nominee*, no appropriations until the president stops illegal impoundment, impeachment
February 23, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Politics in the US has been at a dead-end long before Trump.

We cannot change the dominant two parties, due to their internal lack of democracy.

We cannot create viable third parties, due to ballot access obstacles and our first-past-the-post electoral system.

We need structural change!
February 22, 2025 at 11:39 PM