And, you can't spend your money and keep it in the bank. Make sure you understand something before saying it's stupid.

My current approach - but wouldn't it be nice if this convenient tool worked correctly?

They're citing the same JOSS article, neither cites the package DOI.

Note the loss of the journal name. I would prefer to have the complete citation and not just the doi to use for the journal.

Robinson, David and Seidel, Dana Paige and Spinu, Vitalie and Takahashi, Kohske and Vaughan, Davis and Wilke, Claus and Woo, Kara and Yutani, Hiroaki},
year = {2019},
date = {2019},
pages = {1686},
volume = {4},
doi = {10.21105/joss.01686}
}

D'Agostino} and {François}, Romain and Grolemund, Garrett and Hayes, Alex and Henry, Lionel and Hester, Jim and Kuhn, Max and Pedersen, Thomas Lin and Miller, Evan and Bache, Stephan Milton and {Müller}, Kirill and Ooms, Jeroen and

While the BibTex provided by the visual editor is:
@article{tidyverse,
title = {Welcome to the {\textbraceleft}tidyverse{\textbraceright}},
author = {Wickham, Hadley and Averick, Mara and Bryan, Jennifer and Chang, Winston and McGowan, {Lucy

year = {2019},
journal = {Journal of Open Source Software},
volume = {4},
number = {43},
pages = {1686},
doi = {10.21105/joss.01686},
}

Lionel Henry and Jim Hester and Max Kuhn and Thomas Lin Pedersen and Evan Miller and Stephan Milton Bache and Kirill Müller and Jeroen Ooms and David Robinson and Dana Paige Seidel and Vitalie Spinu and Kohske Takahashi and Davis Vaughan and Claus Wilke and Kara Woo and Hiroaki Yutani},

citation("tidyverse"):
@Article{,
title = {Welcome to the {tidyverse}},
author = {Hadley Wickham and Mara Averick and Jennifer Bryan and Winston Chang and Lucy D'Agostino McGowan and Romain François and Garrett Grolemund and Alex Hayes and

Finding the citation isn't the problem, the issue is the difference in the citation inserted by the visual editor and the one provided by base R, citation(). For example, the BibTex entry provided for the tidyverse package:

Does the possible existence of "regular" rolls, suggest that there may also be constipated rolls?