Thotful Remarks
@thotfulremarks.bsky.social
“AI provides a more credible solution.”
Okay???? Then @ me when it comes up with a credible solution then. Cause right now, it’s the problem. Let’s talk reality not your fantasy about AI and LLMs solving a problem we already have a decent roadmap on how to solve.
Okay???? Then @ me when it comes up with a credible solution then. Cause right now, it’s the problem. Let’s talk reality not your fantasy about AI and LLMs solving a problem we already have a decent roadmap on how to solve.
January 27, 2026 at 2:11 AM
“AI provides a more credible solution.”
Okay???? Then @ me when it comes up with a credible solution then. Cause right now, it’s the problem. Let’s talk reality not your fantasy about AI and LLMs solving a problem we already have a decent roadmap on how to solve.
Okay???? Then @ me when it comes up with a credible solution then. Cause right now, it’s the problem. Let’s talk reality not your fantasy about AI and LLMs solving a problem we already have a decent roadmap on how to solve.
Fashion is not inherently evil; however the practices and industry of fashion have been and continue to be evil. That’s capitalism for you.
Clothes aren’t evil. The people forcing others to make the clothes can be though! Weak argument from you there, if I’m being honest.
Clothes aren’t evil. The people forcing others to make the clothes can be though! Weak argument from you there, if I’m being honest.
January 27, 2026 at 2:09 AM
Fashion is not inherently evil; however the practices and industry of fashion have been and continue to be evil. That’s capitalism for you.
Clothes aren’t evil. The people forcing others to make the clothes can be though! Weak argument from you there, if I’m being honest.
Clothes aren’t evil. The people forcing others to make the clothes can be though! Weak argument from you there, if I’m being honest.
Also you’re right here: bsky.app/profile/macv...
Social change is not a solution. Government regulation - akin to int’l policy that fixed the hole in the ozone - is necessary. In the meantime, i have no issue with individuals fighting against climate change with what they have available to them.
Social change is not a solution. Government regulation - akin to int’l policy that fixed the hole in the ozone - is necessary. In the meantime, i have no issue with individuals fighting against climate change with what they have available to them.
I don't think you're really understanding my argument here. It is:
1. Social change is not a solution to climate change. There has never been a policy on the table with any impact.
2. Fashion is not inherently evil, so why is AI?
3. AI provides a more credible solution (tech/science advancement.)
1. Social change is not a solution to climate change. There has never been a policy on the table with any impact.
2. Fashion is not inherently evil, so why is AI?
3. AI provides a more credible solution (tech/science advancement.)
January 27, 2026 at 2:07 AM
Also you’re right here: bsky.app/profile/macv...
Social change is not a solution. Government regulation - akin to int’l policy that fixed the hole in the ozone - is necessary. In the meantime, i have no issue with individuals fighting against climate change with what they have available to them.
Social change is not a solution. Government regulation - akin to int’l policy that fixed the hole in the ozone - is necessary. In the meantime, i have no issue with individuals fighting against climate change with what they have available to them.
You have to see the logical flaw in your last couple sentences: “we should continue to pollute our environment for AI because AI might save us from pollution”
Replace “pollute” w/ “emit carbon” or “waste water” - same illogical reasoning. AI will not save us from AI. Thinking so is wishful thinking
Replace “pollute” w/ “emit carbon” or “waste water” - same illogical reasoning. AI will not save us from AI. Thinking so is wishful thinking
January 27, 2026 at 2:04 AM
You have to see the logical flaw in your last couple sentences: “we should continue to pollute our environment for AI because AI might save us from pollution”
Replace “pollute” w/ “emit carbon” or “waste water” - same illogical reasoning. AI will not save us from AI. Thinking so is wishful thinking
Replace “pollute” w/ “emit carbon” or “waste water” - same illogical reasoning. AI will not save us from AI. Thinking so is wishful thinking
Basically, you’re doing a whataboutism when we should be asking “what about we reduce carbon emissions across the board?” instead of playing the “well this industry is worse!” game.
As an aside, we don’t need AI. We do need clothes. Flawed comparison at the start, imo.
As an aside, we don’t need AI. We do need clothes. Flawed comparison at the start, imo.
January 26, 2026 at 10:15 AM
Basically, you’re doing a whataboutism when we should be asking “what about we reduce carbon emissions across the board?” instead of playing the “well this industry is worse!” game.
As an aside, we don’t need AI. We do need clothes. Flawed comparison at the start, imo.
As an aside, we don’t need AI. We do need clothes. Flawed comparison at the start, imo.
You’re minimizing the impact AI has on climate change by saying “well this OTHER industry contributes MORE to climate change.”
That’s not a reason to let AI off the hook.
If anything, that’s a reason to regulate AI and fashion (and many other industries) to alleviate their impact on our climate.
That’s not a reason to let AI off the hook.
If anything, that’s a reason to regulate AI and fashion (and many other industries) to alleviate their impact on our climate.
January 26, 2026 at 10:12 AM
You’re minimizing the impact AI has on climate change by saying “well this OTHER industry contributes MORE to climate change.”
That’s not a reason to let AI off the hook.
If anything, that’s a reason to regulate AI and fashion (and many other industries) to alleviate their impact on our climate.
That’s not a reason to let AI off the hook.
If anything, that’s a reason to regulate AI and fashion (and many other industries) to alleviate their impact on our climate.
Now is not the time for these puff pieces, Forbes
January 26, 2026 at 10:00 AM
Now is not the time for these puff pieces, Forbes
Thankfully, it’s not
January 26, 2026 at 9:57 AM
Thankfully, it’s not
Do you honestly not see why that’s a terrible justification?
Thing X is bad for the environment yet people are still using it and that industry around it is growing.
Yes! Amd Thing Y is bad for the environment and production of Thing Y has increased 60% over 10 years!
Let’s not critique either.
Thing X is bad for the environment yet people are still using it and that industry around it is growing.
Yes! Amd Thing Y is bad for the environment and production of Thing Y has increased 60% over 10 years!
Let’s not critique either.
January 26, 2026 at 9:55 AM
Do you honestly not see why that’s a terrible justification?
Thing X is bad for the environment yet people are still using it and that industry around it is growing.
Yes! Amd Thing Y is bad for the environment and production of Thing Y has increased 60% over 10 years!
Let’s not critique either.
Thing X is bad for the environment yet people are still using it and that industry around it is growing.
Yes! Amd Thing Y is bad for the environment and production of Thing Y has increased 60% over 10 years!
Let’s not critique either.
You don’t deserve any attention. You’re just posting this here and on other threads as rage bait. You have no coherent beliefs worth learning about. The overseas paycheck for running your botfarm is not worth sacrificing your soul.
January 26, 2026 at 9:40 AM
You don’t deserve any attention. You’re just posting this here and on other threads as rage bait. You have no coherent beliefs worth learning about. The overseas paycheck for running your botfarm is not worth sacrificing your soul.
Also, although i made my other reply first, your point here is off-topic. Housing being commodified requires more work than if it wasn’t. My point is not a comparison of us vs hunter-gathers, my point is a comparison of us w/ corporate landlords vs us w/o corporate landlords.
May 2, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Also, although i made my other reply first, your point here is off-topic. Housing being commodified requires more work than if it wasn’t. My point is not a comparison of us vs hunter-gathers, my point is a comparison of us w/ corporate landlords vs us w/o corporate landlords.
Not commenting on the actual hours per week but medieval peasants had more free time than we have currently. What’s the point of technological advancements if they aren’t making our lives more efficient and fulfilling? Why can’t we have 3-4 day workweeks?
May 2, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Not commenting on the actual hours per week but medieval peasants had more free time than we have currently. What’s the point of technological advancements if they aren’t making our lives more efficient and fulfilling? Why can’t we have 3-4 day workweeks?
If we reorganized our current system of land ownership & housing to get closer to how it used to be structured, most people would be better off overall (the main exception being landlords).
May 1, 2025 at 9:21 AM
If we reorganized our current system of land ownership & housing to get closer to how it used to be structured, most people would be better off overall (the main exception being landlords).
I think you have misconstrued Hilary’s point. My takeaway from her statement is that the commodification and privatization of land has forced us to work more hours to afford the basic human right of housing. Not that tech, medicine, etc was better back then.
May 1, 2025 at 9:20 AM
I think you have misconstrued Hilary’s point. My takeaway from her statement is that the commodification and privatization of land has forced us to work more hours to afford the basic human right of housing. Not that tech, medicine, etc was better back then.
Seems like The Onion is using the former to skewer the fact the latter still exists:
“At press time, reports confirmed the exhibit had been closed after the patch pulled a trainer into the water and drowned him before partially consuming his body.”
“At press time, reports confirmed the exhibit had been closed after the patch pulled a trainer into the water and drowned him before partially consuming his body.”
April 2, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Seems like The Onion is using the former to skewer the fact the latter still exists:
“At press time, reports confirmed the exhibit had been closed after the patch pulled a trainer into the water and drowned him before partially consuming his body.”
“At press time, reports confirmed the exhibit had been closed after the patch pulled a trainer into the water and drowned him before partially consuming his body.”
I’m sure there are other signs but him vetoing a bill that would have decriminalized mushrooms for those 21 & up in California made it so clear he’s running in 2028 and didn’t want to defend “legalized psychedelics” to Iowans.
March 9, 2025 at 9:18 AM
I’m sure there are other signs but him vetoing a bill that would have decriminalized mushrooms for those 21 & up in California made it so clear he’s running in 2028 and didn’t want to defend “legalized psychedelics” to Iowans.
Don’t go & have someone actually competent do the rebuttal
March 1, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Don’t go & have someone actually competent do the rebuttal
They deleted mine 😔
February 14, 2025 at 7:43 AM
They deleted mine 😔
You’re turning into the guy who sneaks “in nineteen ninety eight the undertaker threw mankind off hell in a cell and plummeted sixteen feet through an announcers table” into reddit comments just for the phrase “alternative rock” and on bluesky. 😂
milk.in - This website is for sale! - Milk Resources and Information.
This website is for sale! milk.in is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, milk.in has it all. We...
milk.in
February 14, 2025 at 7:37 AM
You’re turning into the guy who sneaks “in nineteen ninety eight the undertaker threw mankind off hell in a cell and plummeted sixteen feet through an announcers table” into reddit comments just for the phrase “alternative rock” and on bluesky. 😂
Forever thankful i don’t know who that is 🙏🏼
January 3, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Forever thankful i don’t know who that is 🙏🏼