Tim Frayling
@timfrayling.bsky.social
690 followers 210 following 150 posts
Human genetics, type 2 diabetes and obesity in today's environment. Cycling uphill. Team science. New shoots in Geneva & France, long roots in the UK & Exeter. https://www.unige.ch/medecine/gede/en/research-groups/timothy-frayling
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
timfrayling.bsky.social
thanks to @laraedw001.bsky.social for highlighting this micro.green-park.co.uk/hdrs/. I suggest whoever gets this position, pops over to Switzerland as the SPHN have achieved great things with consented data from 10% of the population available for study a few months after application & in a TRE
HDRS
micro.green-park.co.uk
timfrayling.bsky.social
When you say "nobody" do you mean "nobody outside of your health care providers" ? your hospital will use your data all the time to help audit and improve their services ?
timfrayling.bsky.social
smart work aged 8. but possibly redundant for 17 years time when birth rates in europe may be 0.1 per couple. Maybe aged 85 : lose large amount of money to pay for private social care ?
timfrayling.bsky.social
thanks Laura. Yes I think the 1st slide on PRS talks needs to be "do not compare PRS to clinical genetics, compare to the common, equally bad & equally good , stuff your doctor measures all the time to stratify you - LDLC, blood pressure, family history, ancestry and BMI" (to add to your age & sex)
timfrayling.bsky.social
the first one does not seem to be the right question.
timfrayling.bsky.social
great stuff but why compare with PRS ? I do not think anyone is suggesting we should use one and not the other ? Can we not have our PRS cake and eat the EHRs :-)
timfrayling.bsky.social
Amazing study. A simple but important question affecting up to 50% of the population yet previously understudied . And an exemplar in the power of multi-modal data linkage. www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/news/...
2025: Periods and GCSE results | Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children | University of Bristol
www.bristol.ac.uk
timfrayling.bsky.social
Deadline 31/08. Join a friendly team in the heart of Europe. Build your research career in human genetics & genomics using data from millions of individuals to address important causes and consequences of disease. Apply here lnkd.in/dyZcgc-g More information on the team here: lnkd.in/dzZ2aU4Z
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
timfrayling.bsky.social
similar scenario for height. even though the common genetics is "saturated" the height range one person could be based on their PRS is very wide. (which is of course a separate argument compared to using PRS to stratify people)
timfrayling.bsky.social
nice summary thanks Andrea. I wonder if this challenge will become easier in a few years if and when clinicians inform a young adult patient they would like to "do" their genetics at the same time as their first blood pressure/FEV/LDL-cholesterol etc test.
timfrayling.bsky.social
Best of British : Black Sabbath’s Paranoid played by the Coldstream guards to commemorate Ozzy Osborne
timfrayling.bsky.social
Does it even make sense to compare PGS to proteomic risk scores though ? one is a once in a lifetime assay that costs about $40. the other....is not. The most relevant comparison for proteomic scores is likely to be routine biochemistry ?
timfrayling.bsky.social
The Pope Song by Tim Minchin would be a controversial choice
timfrayling.bsky.social
true. given the input and outputs involved maybe the MRC and WT will chip in :-)