TJ McIntyre
banner
tjmcintyre.com
TJ McIntyre
@tjmcintyre.com
I'm an associate professor of law at University College Dublin specialising in technology law (mostly privacy/data protection/cybercrime/fundamental rights), consultant solicitor with FP Logue LLP, and chair of Digital Rights Ireland.
Reposted by TJ McIntyre
The DAX did fine until Stalingrad.
January 12, 2026 at 8:52 AM
On a purely vibes-based analysis, I don't see courts being receptive to an X argument based on overblocking. The obvious answer is that X chose to merge AI nudification into the main domain, and it could just as easily unmerge it. After all, it already has a separate grok .com/imagine site.
January 11, 2026 at 10:35 PM
I suspect the proportionality analysis will vary significantly depending on whether the site operator is itself encouraging or directly engaging in illegal use (no longer merely an intermediary). X is more akin to The Pirate Bay caselaw in deliberately flouting the law.
January 11, 2026 at 10:23 PM
Reposted by TJ McIntyre
anyway I feel like this more than anything is evidence that we are in a sort of singularity for Weird Shit Happening, when the machines trained on the knowledge of six months ago think the present moment is insane and refuse to engage with it
January 11, 2026 at 7:47 PM
Also, 'bikini' images are not the only concern. The Grok chatbot replies on the main X site does have some guardrails but Grok Imagine (grok .com/imagine) generates full nudes, penetration, etc.
www.wired.com/story/grok-i...
Grok Is Generating Sexual Content Far More Graphic Than What's on X
A WIRED review of outputs hosted on Grok’s official website shows it’s being used to create violent sexual images and videos, as well as content that includes apparent minors.
www.wired.com
January 11, 2026 at 6:51 PM
It only seems to be available if you have downloaded the app at some point
January 11, 2026 at 11:35 AM
Sample text I sent earlier:
January 11, 2026 at 11:14 AM