Timothy Ryan
@tjryan02.bsky.social
1.6K followers 260 following 210 posts
Professor of Political Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Navigare necesse est. https://timryan.web.unc.edu/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
tjryan02.bsky.social
My wife's roots are in Georgia. I've thought about how it's quite possible that one of her relatives killed one of mine, or vice-versa.
tjryan02.bsky.social
No doubt you've seen the movie Glory. (I rewatched it recently.)
Reposted by Timothy Ryan
ryanenos.bsky.social
Somebody actually sat down and wrote these two sentences, one after another. www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/u...
tjryan02.bsky.social
Neat! Here is a history of my relative, written by someone in the National Archives, many years ago.
tjryan02.bsky.social
AI tools helped me finish a replica of the regimental flag that my 3x great grandfather fought (and died) under during the Civil War. It's based on a photo of the deteriorated flag that I got from the New Jersey State Museum.

I like how it came out! And what it symbolizes.
tjryan02.bsky.social
Today's cute teaching example of the kind of policy that a federal bureaucrat would need to make: when a blind person hires someone to groom their seeing eye dog, is this a tax deductible medical expense? See below for the answer.
tjryan02.bsky.social
Apropos of nothing, here is a montage from the great 2008 series Generation Kill where John Sixta--the battalion yutz--bangs on and on about adherence to the "grooming standard." (NSFW)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQr9...
Sixta and the grooming standard
YouTube video by Taran Axethorpe
www.youtube.com
tjryan02.bsky.social
You want my letter of recommendation to be answers to six questions that you came up with, and that are specific to your organization.

I want to write one general purpose letter that covers all the same substance and that I can upload to *any* organization.

We are not the same.
Reposted by Timothy Ryan
brianguay.bsky.social
UNC Political Science is hiring in methods!

UNC has an amazing department and the triangle is a great place to live.

Tenure Track Assistant Professor in Methods (Deadline Oct 24)

link to the posting👇
unc.peopleadmin.com/postings/307...

#polisky #psjobs #poliscijobs
unc.peopleadmin.com
tjryan02.bsky.social
I'll credit Thomas as a committed originalist when he points to the clause in the Constitution that grants the president near-blanket immunity from criminal prosecution.
sharonk.bsky.social
Cass Sunstein: not the man for the moment
But you believe that all nine of the Justices are committed to liberalism of the sort that you outlined in your book and are trying to uphold it?
Yeah. Oh, yeah. I’m not going to name any names, but there is a conservative judge who did read the first couple of chapters of the book and did say, I agree with all of this.
Wow. I would just say that I find it very hard to believe, especially with Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who seem to me to be kind of out-and-out partisan Trump supporters.
This is completely fair to question. Alito is an extremely careful lawyer and a very precise judge. He is clearly taken with a certain view of our culture that is shared by many of Trump’s supporters. But is it possible to find an opinion in which he says, I’m going to go this way because the President is the law, or anything that verges on that? I think that’s very hard to find. Is there anything in his opinions that shows disrespect for freedom of speech or freedom of religion? I think that’s impossible to find. Thomas is an originalist. He’s the most committed originalist on the Court, who believes the Constitution should be understood in accordance with its original meaning. I don’t like that view much, but you can hold that view and be a liberal in the sense of believing in the rule of law, believing in freedom of speech. He does want to overrule New York Times v. Sullivan, but he’s not the only one who thinks that and that doesn’t make him illiberal. [That decision, from 1964, raised the standard for defamation lawsuits in a way that is seen as crucial to press freedom.] So I do agree with you. There are concerning things about political connections that appear, but in terms of the liberal tradition I’m not giving up on Justice Thomas.
tjryan02.bsky.social
Of all the times in history that someone was handed $50,000 cash in a takeout bag, what percentage of them do you suppose were completely legitimate and above-the-board?
tjryan02.bsky.social
"Preregistration isn't handcuffs" ~ Me.

If it were, Alexander Fleming might have to roll back his happenstancial discovery of a bacteria-eating "mold juice" (penicillin).
tjryan02.bsky.social
In NC, you need a prescription for Covid. My PCP wants me to come and visit the office to get said prescription. It's so bananas.

My mom got sent home from CVS because her doc gave her an Rx for Pfizer and that CVS only had Moderna. She had to get the Rx updated and go back.
tjryan02.bsky.social
Political violence is bad. That’s it. That’s the tweet. (Skeet.)
tjryan02.bsky.social
This is true, but the number of districts that are way out of whack is quite small. (See below.)
tjryan02.bsky.social
from this one.

All this is separate from gerrymandering, which is about how legislative districts are drawn. (Mostly irrelevant to presidential elections.)

Making the House bigger *might* indeed make gerrymandering harder---but it's not, like, analytically straightforward. Complicated question.
tjryan02.bsky.social
to the US Senate, where a WY vote weighs more than 60x a CA one. The distortion would get a little better if the College were bigger, but the distortion already only really benefits a few very small states.

The winner-take-all system is an additional Electoral College distortion distinct
tjryan02.bsky.social
Ah. There are a few things here. A state's weight in the Elec. College grows steadily in proportion to its population--subject to the restriction that all states start with 3 EVs. This is a distortion, but not an especially huge one. A WY vote weighs ~3.5 times as much as a CA one.

Compare that
tjryan02.bsky.social
I'm also not sure whether gerrymandering becomes easier or harder with smaller-population districts. That seems analytically tricky, and to depend on the geographical distribution of Dems vs. Reps.
tjryan02.bsky.social
Still? I don't think the US House ever had a proportional representation system in the modern sense of that phrase. Am I missing something?

What do you mean by land being more disproportionate? Districts need to have approximately equal populations. (Except 6 states with just 1 representative.)