Jaja, das is okay. Ich wollte auch nicht so pedantisch sein. Xd
50% war etwas zuviel für mich, wenn die Basis 11% und ich wusste nicht das Ergebnis der letzten Wahl.

Ja, aber 30% Wachstum mit 11% als Basis ist 14.3%, 50% sollten eher 16.5% sein. Es wäre also eher 30% als 50%.
Ist aber nur ein Detail, da ich nicht sicher war, ob es sich auf die letzte Wahl bezog.

Die Grûnen wachsen um 30% oder?

Mir gefiel die Serie ... mit vielen japanischen Animee werde ich nicht warm aber diese Serie ist gut ...

Hit might not be the right word but for sure electrons are accumulated there. Charging up effects un these devices are well known. Sparks are certainly a risk. I think there should be more VUV photons per area as usual due to the close distance. But I might be too negative.

This is an interesting idea (I know a few of the authors) but I admit I have my doubts about real experiments. I might be proven wrong but the long-term operation of such a device with electrons hitting over months, not only 20h, the TPB seems tough. Certainly, an interesting and good R&D project.

It should be "from the moon" instead of Earth.

Here one can find some nice examples of wide-angle versus tele for the same objects:
digital-photography-school.com/wide-angle-v....
This should make clear that the lens is here the key.

It all depends on the lens. It seems the LRO had two kinds of cameras on board. The narrow-angle camera could take photos from the earth with sizes down to 0.5 m/pixel, probably used for this photo. The wide-angle Camera took photos with 100 m/pixel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_R...

Yeah, but unfortunately I cannot ... I am working on long-baseline neutrino experiments, T2K and Hyper-Kamiokande. I discussed it with colleagues but I doubt I am the right person for this. And time is another problem ...