Tom Dannenbaum
@tomdannenbaum.bsky.social
Professor @law.stanford.edu | @stanfordcisac.bsky.social | @fsi.stanford.edu
International Law: IHL, ICL, IHRL, use of force, ethics
Editor, Just Security: https://shorturl.at/NuHYQ
Bio: https://law.stanford.edu/tom-dannenbaum/
Book: http://bit.ly/3HRrAs4
International Law: IHL, ICL, IHRL, use of force, ethics
Editor, Just Security: https://shorturl.at/NuHYQ
Bio: https://law.stanford.edu/tom-dannenbaum/
Book: http://bit.ly/3HRrAs4
Reposted by Tom Dannenbaum
A note from our editors:
February 1, 2026 at 9:10 PM
A note from our editors:
Fair, but they didn't update the clock during the Cuban missile crisis & determined that certain trends arising from it reduced risk.
Also:
i. overall catastrophe risk is heightened when multiple dyads have a danger of nuclear war
ii. other existential risks factor in (climatic, technological, etc)
Also:
i. overall catastrophe risk is heightened when multiple dyads have a danger of nuclear war
ii. other existential risks factor in (climatic, technological, etc)
January 29, 2026 at 6:41 PM
Fair, but they didn't update the clock during the Cuban missile crisis & determined that certain trends arising from it reduced risk.
Also:
i. overall catastrophe risk is heightened when multiple dyads have a danger of nuclear war
ii. other existential risks factor in (climatic, technological, etc)
Also:
i. overall catastrophe risk is heightened when multiple dyads have a danger of nuclear war
ii. other existential risks factor in (climatic, technological, etc)