Another great case for that are inequalities on a graph. An evidence for some and an aberration for others.
November 17, 2025 at 11:59 PM
Another great case for that are inequalities on a graph. An evidence for some and an aberration for others.
This is despite probably countless table of values some have done...
I always repeat to every year from 7 to 11, "the equation is the way to link the y and x coordinates of all the points of that curve/line blablabla..." hoping something some time will stick but words do not suffice for many.
I always repeat to every year from 7 to 11, "the equation is the way to link the y and x coordinates of all the points of that curve/line blablabla..." hoping something some time will stick but words do not suffice for many.
November 17, 2025 at 11:57 PM
This is despite probably countless table of values some have done...
I always repeat to every year from 7 to 11, "the equation is the way to link the y and x coordinates of all the points of that curve/line blablabla..." hoping something some time will stick but words do not suffice for many.
I always repeat to every year from 7 to 11, "the equation is the way to link the y and x coordinates of all the points of that curve/line blablabla..." hoping something some time will stick but words do not suffice for many.
Thank you, i did not know it, so this just started this year it looks? If i sum it up clvery crudely, is it like a Gsce paper, but only the hardest topics and harder questions? I will look into it.
November 14, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Thank you, i did not know it, so this just started this year it looks? If i sum it up clvery crudely, is it like a Gsce paper, but only the hardest topics and harder questions? I will look into it.
I knew underground Maths, but not well enough to see there were some stuff accessible to GCSE, thanks.
November 14, 2025 at 7:11 PM
I knew underground Maths, but not well enough to see there were some stuff accessible to GCSE, thanks.
I am new to this (both profession and bluesky), but curious if there ever was a #WeeklyFails ?
Not that i want to ruin the atmosphere but it might prove quite informative and useful as well? I'm sure I will be able to share a few.
Not that i want to ruin the atmosphere but it might prove quite informative and useful as well? I'm sure I will be able to share a few.
November 14, 2025 at 6:55 PM
I am new to this (both profession and bluesky), but curious if there ever was a #WeeklyFails ?
Not that i want to ruin the atmosphere but it might prove quite informative and useful as well? I'm sure I will be able to share a few.
Not that i want to ruin the atmosphere but it might prove quite informative and useful as well? I'm sure I will be able to share a few.
Squeeze theorem or "two policemen" theorem in France, or also "two cops and a drunk" theorem in some quarters.
Sorry for the disgression and poor contribution to your issue.
Sorry for the disgression and poor contribution to your issue.
November 4, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Squeeze theorem or "two policemen" theorem in France, or also "two cops and a drunk" theorem in some quarters.
Sorry for the disgression and poor contribution to your issue.
Sorry for the disgression and poor contribution to your issue.
But I am not saying this means it is better this or that way...
October 21, 2025 at 7:19 PM
But I am not saying this means it is better this or that way...
As an example, you can go through all ks3/ks4 content without ever defining what a plane is, and what it means for two planes to be parallel...whereas this was probably something i was shown early in my secondary education...
October 21, 2025 at 7:19 PM
As an example, you can go through all ks3/ks4 content without ever defining what a plane is, and what it means for two planes to be parallel...whereas this was probably something i was shown early in my secondary education...
Thanks for the feedback. With my limited experience, it just feels a bit light in England, compared to how I remember it being taught to me (quite some time ago...and in another country)
October 21, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Thanks for the feedback. With my limited experience, it just feels a bit light in England, compared to how I remember it being taught to me (quite some time ago...and in another country)
This is just based on my distant and foggy school memories of ks3 geometry.
October 21, 2025 at 8:22 AM
This is just based on my distant and foggy school memories of ks3 geometry.
I was a ks3 student a long time ago and in a different country, but my superficial impressions is that the curriculum remains quite light and not very rigorous..?
October 21, 2025 at 8:22 AM
I was a ks3 student a long time ago and in a different country, but my superficial impressions is that the curriculum remains quite light and not very rigorous..?
This constraint was there just in the context of UK maths education. I doubt euclidean axioms or its closely linked propositions are ever mentioned (even if we keep on going about angles in polygons...)
October 12, 2025 at 10:07 PM
This constraint was there just in the context of UK maths education. I doubt euclidean axioms or its closely linked propositions are ever mentioned (even if we keep on going about angles in polygons...)
Yes, maybe a bit of an ambiguous constraint...2 sides are perpendicular to same side so they are parallel. Then, as those 2 sides are parallel, as one is perpendicular to the last side then other is also perpendicular to it. Hence last angle is 90° as well.
October 12, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Yes, maybe a bit of an ambiguous constraint...2 sides are perpendicular to same side so they are parallel. Then, as those 2 sides are parallel, as one is perpendicular to the last side then other is also perpendicular to it. Hence last angle is 90° as well.