Tom Moyer
@tommoyerut.bsky.social
1.2K followers 540 following 800 posts
Defiant positivity. Decency & integrity over partisanship. #PrinciplesFirst. Utah Citizens’ Climate Lobby. EOD robotics engineer & former science educator. Utah.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Friends in town visiting us from Florida - so we had to show them a good time.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Wonderful message from my friend, Adrielle Herring.
“No one owes us assent simply because we believe we’re right. If we want others to share our views, we must do the work of persuasion — meeting people where they are, exercising patience and wrestling with problems that rarely have easy answers.”
Opinion: How do we stop seeing political opponents as enemies?
Our nation is straining under the expensive, unintended consequences of hot-take policy-making.
www.deseret.com
tommoyerut.bsky.social
“Because they did it first” has got to be the lamest excuse I’ve ever heard from grown men and women.
Reposted by Tom Moyer
atrupar.com
There is no world in which it is normal for the president to publicly call upon his attorney general to hurry up and prosecute his political foes. It’s like the Watergate tapes but posted on social media. Let’s get a grip on what’s happening here.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Zero conservation calls this summer for Texas, thanks to new solar and storage builds.
canarymedia.com
Texas has already broken an overwhelming 17 solar generation records this year, and battery storage isn’t far behind.

Here’s how renewables and storage kept Texas’ grid rock solid this summer:
Solar and batteries had a record-setting, grid-stabilizing summer in…
Solar has set 17 power generation records in Texas so far this year, shoring up the grid alongside batteries as some gas plant developers step back.
www.canarymedia.com
Reposted by Tom Moyer
walterolson.bsky.social
ICE's huge raid on a Hyundai battery plant under construction in Georgia has outraged and alienated key U.S. ally South Korea, while setting back prospects of getting successful foreign companies to manufacture in America. My colleague @scottlincicome.bsky.social has a wrap-up.
An ICE Raid in Georgia Becomes a Massive (and Unsurprising) U.S. Policy Failure
Zero-sum thinking comes with big costs.
www.cato.org
Reposted by Tom Moyer
mliebreich.bsky.social
Trigger warning. If you think the answer to climate change is degrowth, modern monetary theory, global revolution, 100% WWS, 100% nuclear power, the hydrogen economy, or any other Monty Python cult, please don't read the #PragmaticClimateReset. 17/n
about.bnef.com/insights/cle...
Liebreich: The Pragmatic Climate Reset – Part II: A Provocation | BloombergNEF
As the debate on transition deepens, Michael Liebreich details how a pragmatic climate and energy reset might unfold.
about.bnef.com
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Great stuff here, informed by solid numbers.

Read it all. But if that’s too much, then read the 🧵
mliebreich.bsky.social
The #PragmaticClimateReset is a two part-essay calling for a reset in our approach to climate action. Part I shows why narratives trumpeting the failure of efforts to date are wrong. Part II says that, nevertheless, the climate community now needs to change its approach. 1/n
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Great story. Thanks for flagging!

And yes - there’s a really good lesson there in how to talk about these energy projects.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
We do have actual environmental challenges that we need to tackle. We can and we will address them, and we need to speed it up. If you focus your effort there instead of on energy consumption, we might actually do some good.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
… we’re so far from any actual physical constraints that I have no idea how to answer it. 10,000x as much energy falls on the earth’s surface in the form of sunlight as we use from all conventional energy sources. We could 100x our energy use by harvesting 1% of it. So who knows what’s optimal. 2/3
tommoyerut.bsky.social
I’m glad you asked the question. I think it’s useful for clarifying our differences. For me, the entire premise is baffling. You’re trying to use energy as a proxy for environmental impact, so you want to put limits on how much of it people can use. But it’s terrible proxy for that and … 1/2
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I get the distinct impression that you wouldn’t actually be happy if we could just solve the environmental harm - that’d you’d prefer it if it came with an excuse to block certain uses of energy.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Instead of trying to tell people what energy use is and isn’t necessary, you could just go after the actual environmental harms. You’d be a lot more successful.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Well that’s where we disagree. We are making massive strides on improving human well-being, driven by access to energy. Limiting energy use is a terrible goal. Minimizing pollution and other environmental impacts is a good one.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
I’m concerned about those issues too. I fully agree with the importance of leaving the place better than we found it. But each one of them needs different tools.

We have a history of solving problems. Here is air pollution. We’re not done, but turning the corner *while* increasing access to energy.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Large pieces of this are unpersuasive to me (and I suspect to most people). But the direction is good. If you can talk about how you’re going to make people’s lives better, then you have a chance.
good.you
tommoyerut.bsky.social
I don’t disagree. But telling people you’re going to cut access to energy is politically toxic. So you still have a gigantic hurdle to overcome. And even if you succeeded, that only takes care of a piece of the problem.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
But yes - of course a decline in economic activity produces a decline in emissions. That’s exactly what you’d expect.

That isn’t the bar you have to clear. The hurdle is convincing people that this is going to improve their lives.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
I was making fun of you.

Cutting energy use isn’t necessary. (We can cut emissions without it.)
It isn’t sufficient. (We have to get to zero.)
I see no non-coercive way to get there.
And your invoking of covid and the collapse of the USSR suggests that you see massive human suffering as acceptable.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
You: looks at rapidly growing clean energy. “Hey - it hasn’t worked yet! Let’s do another Covid instead. That’ll go over well.”
tommoyerut.bsky.social
You can define degrowth however you want to. But where I come from it means cutting energy use and living standards.

So yes - they are in fact defacto degrowthers, even if you don’t want them on your team.
tommoyerut.bsky.social
Are you … seriously arguing for those as models to follow for reducing emissions?