And in such situation Republicans would go: why do the State prohibit me from helping people in need? And make a lot of fuzz about it. It seems to been a game where tearing down institutions and rules is the way to win. Thus there is no good strategy.
December 27, 2025 at 4:37 AM
And in such situation Republicans would go: why do the State prohibit me from helping people in need? And make a lot of fuzz about it. It seems to been a game where tearing down institutions and rules is the way to win. Thus there is no good strategy.
Politics in the USA is beginning to look more like politics in Argentina, where you do win by "clientilismo” – “turning campaigns into mutual aid hubs”. I would suggest some curiosity before you start attacking new ideas. I agree, it’s not good, but if it works it is still democracy.
December 27, 2025 at 4:12 AM
Politics in the USA is beginning to look more like politics in Argentina, where you do win by "clientilismo” – “turning campaigns into mutual aid hubs”. I would suggest some curiosity before you start attacking new ideas. I agree, it’s not good, but if it works it is still democracy.
Reposted by Tor Opsvik
I dag er polariseringen rundt skatt mye større. Skattedebatten sto sentralt i valgkampen, og høyresida tapte. Så skal de tydeligvis få vinne allikevel, fordi ingen tør å motsi Stoltenberg, som har utvist elendig fingerspissfølelse helt siden han kom tilbake som finansminister.
December 7, 2025 at 12:57 PM
I dag er polariseringen rundt skatt mye større. Skattedebatten sto sentralt i valgkampen, og høyresida tapte. Så skal de tydeligvis få vinne allikevel, fordi ingen tør å motsi Stoltenberg, som har utvist elendig fingerspissfølelse helt siden han kom tilbake som finansminister.