@tripliyigames.bsky.social
@bigesqbae.bsky.social
As someone who is both a Nintendo enthusiast as well as someone who understands IP/patent laws much more than I do, I wanted to field your opinion on the Nintendo/Palworld suit.
If I understand correctly, can no one have rideable mounts anymore with this patent precedent?
As someone who is both a Nintendo enthusiast as well as someone who understands IP/patent laws much more than I do, I wanted to field your opinion on the Nintendo/Palworld suit.
If I understand correctly, can no one have rideable mounts anymore with this patent precedent?
November 24, 2024 at 1:57 AM
@bigesqbae.bsky.social
As someone who is both a Nintendo enthusiast as well as someone who understands IP/patent laws much more than I do, I wanted to field your opinion on the Nintendo/Palworld suit.
If I understand correctly, can no one have rideable mounts anymore with this patent precedent?
As someone who is both a Nintendo enthusiast as well as someone who understands IP/patent laws much more than I do, I wanted to field your opinion on the Nintendo/Palworld suit.
If I understand correctly, can no one have rideable mounts anymore with this patent precedent?