Tom Tilley
@ttilley64.bsky.social
The absence of Ed Martin (if that's what we had here, rather than "partial absence") would be an awesome thing. The absence of Ed Martin because they finally realized how utterly incompetent he is...eh...I'll take it, but we know what will follow is more months of similar flailing by someone else.
February 2, 2026 at 9:26 PM
The absence of Ed Martin (if that's what we had here, rather than "partial absence") would be an awesome thing. The absence of Ed Martin because they finally realized how utterly incompetent he is...eh...I'll take it, but we know what will follow is more months of similar flailing by someone else.
...and also incredibly stupid that NYT needs to tell us the same false crap?
February 2, 2026 at 9:18 PM
...and also incredibly stupid that NYT needs to tell us the same false crap?
Just before seeing this I saw a video of US Attorney for DC Jeannine Pirro threatening to prosecute anyone who "bring[s] a gun into this district".
February 2, 2026 at 9:17 PM
Just before seeing this I saw a video of US Attorney for DC Jeannine Pirro threatening to prosecute anyone who "bring[s] a gun into this district".
Reposted by Tom Tilley
It's nice that she's enforcing gun laws, but I wonder if the NRA feels they got their money's worth in endorsing Trump.
February 2, 2026 at 9:15 PM
It's nice that she's enforcing gun laws, but I wonder if the NRA feels they got their money's worth in endorsing Trump.
So, basically, they're always failures.
February 1, 2026 at 11:16 PM
So, basically, they're always failures.
If it *doesn't* show that then it's not clear exactly what it does show, that required an emergency evacuation of the Oval Office.
February 1, 2026 at 9:44 PM
If it *doesn't* show that then it's not clear exactly what it does show, that required an emergency evacuation of the Oval Office.