Dean Baratta
banner
twsisu.bsky.social
Dean Baratta
@twsisu.bsky.social
Three decades (😱) as an intelligence analyst with portfolios ranging from the 8th Guards Army to the Bloods street gang to domestic terrorism of various stripes. Pro 🇺🇸, NATO, 🇺🇦 and the US Postal Service.
And that’s how you get two Trump administrations 🙄
January 25, 2026 at 3:18 PM
At least we finally got the world to all agree on something.
a woman in a brown shirt is standing in front of a green door .
ALT: a woman in a brown shirt is standing in front of a green door .
media.tenor.com
January 24, 2026 at 12:48 PM
I’m not looking forward to a National Guard / ICE street fight but it seems more possible by the day
January 18, 2026 at 1:21 PM
This is also a problem in the field of intelligence. Big pushes to use it to (somehow, magically) get a better understanding of threats and risks without gaining the fundamental knowledge and ability to communicate.

bsky.app/profile/twsi...
Over the past few months I’ve spoken to a number of intelligence analysts in the private sector about their use of LLMs in their work.

A number of concerning observations 🧵

1) Overwhelmingly, LLMs are thrust upon them by management with no training or direction other than ‘use it somehow’.
December 21, 2025 at 4:36 PM
5) instead of asking “should we integrate LLMs into our workflows?” And “What are the benefits and costs?” Teams mostly jump into “HOW do we integrate?”

Skipping the most important step.

This is going to hit people coming into the field particularly hard.
December 20, 2025 at 11:07 PM
4) research over the past 18 months raises some big red flags about frequent LLM use on cognitive ability, information retention & understanding, and (most concerning) *desire* to engage in critical thinking.

All essential elements of the intelligence profession.
December 20, 2025 at 11:07 PM
2) analysts are left to figure out how to use it on their own…lots of potential for misuse and incentives to just copy/paste results

3) few teams have done any sort of risk assessments. Given the past 20 years, is it a safe bet to assume Zuckerberg, Musk, et. al. Won’t misuse data or skew results?
December 20, 2025 at 11:07 PM
That means a mix of compromise and education that will likely take a few years and meanwhile voting/supporting the most progressive candidates likely to win in races, even if they aren’t very progressive.
December 10, 2024 at 10:33 PM
I suspect the ads were following public sentiment rather than creating it. Dems tried a pro-immigrant approach in 2016 and 2020 and it didn’t gain much traction.

We need to stop thinking a better ad or a lefty Joe Rogan will solve our problems. Voters have heard our positions and don’t like them.
December 10, 2024 at 10:31 PM
I wonder what these folks said about Jan 6 or 9/11…
December 10, 2024 at 12:04 PM
I think it’s possible but they’d definitely need some latitude…I’m just not sure there’s much of an incentive structure for the online crowd to give anyone that.
December 9, 2024 at 10:29 PM
Is there really an option for a (commercially viable) podcast like that that doesn’t get pilloried if they ask a dumb question or make an off colored joke?

Full disclosure: not a listener of any part of the bro pipeline (unless The Daily or Pod Save America guys count)
December 9, 2024 at 10:25 PM
I suspect there’s no way it’d survive the social media purity tests…as many have said before, these outlets mostly started as not overtly political and explored a wide range of views (in my generation it was Howard Stern) either for humor, curiosity, whatever.
December 9, 2024 at 10:19 PM
Of equal interest (to me) are the folks who were so quick to lionize the shooter - no stated ideology or goal…just for killing someone.

If the end of that road doesn’t chill people 🤷‍♂️
December 9, 2024 at 7:48 PM