@tylerromualdi.bsky.social
41 followers 35 following 28 posts
Ph.D. Candidate (ABD) in the Department of Political Science at Western University.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted
jacklucas.bsky.social
Happy to report that this article is now available: doi.org/10.1017/S000.... See Tyler's thread below for more detail on the associated R package and interactive online app.
Reposted
jacklucas.bsky.social
"Place Types." Excited that this paper with @sborwein.bsky.social is now available. We develop a new typology of place types in Canada at a fairly fine-grained level of geography, and then show how these place types relate to Canadian politics. doi.org/10.1017/S000...
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
Very excited to share our paper on the vote intention dataset in @cjps-rcsp.bsky.social.

See the earlier thread for more on the Shiny app, R package, and descriptive analyses of demographic divides in vote intention. We'll keep updating this resource—stay tuned!

📄 www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
Special thanks to @anne-imz.bsky.social, the grad students/faculty involved with the CSDC at McGill University, the @clessn.bsky.social research team at Université Laval, and our discussants at past conferences.

We are very grateful for the constructive feedback and thought-provoking questions! 🙂
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
As AI’s capabilities expand, opportunities to study the dynamic nature of citizens' risk perceptions and their effects on human behaviour appear boundless.

We hope our dread-controllability framework motivates deeper theoretical and empirical exploration of how citizens perceive AI and its risks.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
We validate these measures by regressing each scale on covariates linked to AI attitudes.

As shown below, key cross-national predictors of AI dread and controllability concerns include trust in scientists, conspiracy thinking, and beliefs that technological change will harm one’s job prospects.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
The items for the AI Dread and AI Controllability Concern Measures.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
Using data from 🇨🇦 and 🇯🇵, we develop four-item dread and controllability measures and identify the single best item to use for researchers with limited survey space.

The scales are highly reliable and largely uncorrelated (r = 0.05 in Canada, 0.01 in Japan). We summarize these new measures below.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
We suggest that controllability concerns stem from:

(a) unease about AI appearing outright out-of-control akin to Frankenstein's monster type scenarios;

(b) uncertainty over who controls it, seen in debates about AI capitalism and authoritarian regimes using AI to push revisionist narratives.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
If you're like me, some ideas are better contextualized through memes or playful references, like this creative cartoon that loosely illustrates a key component of our dread argument.

Image credit: Joe Heller.
Image source: https://theweek.com/political-satire/1022837/ai-takeover
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
We theorize that citizens’ dread of AI stems from:

a) Its impact on employability, inequality, and the disappearance of professions.

b) Its capacity to match or surpass human intellect/ undermine human initiative and independent thinking.

c) Its potential to pose existential threats to humanity.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
Dread captures the perceived magnitude of risk associated with AI, while controllability reflects the perceived ability to manage its development and consequences.

We propose a new framework centered on these dimensions and introduce two measures: the AI Dread and AI Controllability Concern Scale.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
Studies often link AI attitudes to demographics, predispositions, or framing. Yet, the factors structuring these beliefs remain contested.

We argue that a growing literature implicitly highlights how citizens’ views of AI and its risks stem from a sense of dread and a perceived lack of control.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
AI has immense potential to drive innovation, but recent news highlights its complex societal role—from attempts to “resurrect” politicians to sway elections, to using AI to suppress voter turnout or win art competitions. These issues raise a key question: how do lay citizens view AI and its risks?
Image and news article source: https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2024/2/12/how-ai-is-used-to-resurrect-dead-indian-politicians-as-elections-loom Image and news article source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/26/steve-kramer-admits-he-commissioned-robocall-ai-biden-new-hampshire Image and news article source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-artists.html
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
How do ordinary citizens think about AI and its associated risks cross-nationally—and how can we measure it?

I’m thrilled to share a new paper in Journal of Risk Research with @tylergirard.bsky.social, Mathieu Turgeon, Yannick Dufresne, Takeshi Iida & Tetsuya Matsubayashi.

doi.org/10.1080/1366...
Reposted
jacklucas.bsky.social
This new R package makes it easy to extract weighted annual estimates of vote intention for the major parties going back to the 1940s. For instance, here's annual vote intention for the Liberals, with a red line marking where they currently stand in the polls according to the 338 aggregator.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please feel free to reach out to me or Jack.

Let's dive into the data! #CdnPoli #Election2025
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
After many years of weekly Zoom hackathon sessions, we're excited to release this!

We'll continue updating the resource (soon with issue attitudes) and hope it helps illuminate key demographic trends, regional shifts, and electoral changes from postwar realignments to contemporary divides.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
Special thanks to Dave Armstrong for leading the way with the R package and Shiny App! The Shiny is available here: quantoid.shinyapps.io/cvpa_app/
Canadian Voting and Attitudes Project - Voting Analysis
quantoid.shinyapps.io
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
We also hope the data will be a helpful tool for teaching and reaching the wider public. It allows users to select a specific demographic variable, choose parties, and view trends in vote intent/choice or explore the cross-classification of two variables, such as gender and education (among others)
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
The first function, wtd_vote, creates weighted estimates of party support for specified demographic groups, while gap_analysis generates statistical estimates of the difference in support among demographic group members for each party. Each figure above was created using these functions.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
In addition, we’ve created a new R package, Canadian Voting and Policy Attitudes ("CVPA"). The CVPA package focuses on providing weighted party support by demographic groups over time. It contains the raw data and two functions designed to be particularly helpful for researchers.
tylerromualdi.bsky.social
Special thanks to Alex Cooper at Queen's University for making the dataset publicly available on the Canadian Opinion Research Archive! Those interested can download the data here: doi.org/10.5683/SP3/...
Canadian Vote Intention Dataset
The Canadian Vote Intention Dataset is a new and harmonized database spanning nearly eight decades (1945–2023) of public opinion surveys from Gallu...
doi.org