A lawyer saying they didn’t have access to Westlaw or LexisNexis is like a carpenter saying they don’t have a hammer.

I don’t think “appears” means what the NYT thinks it does.

Sadly this seems true and he probably really thinks you could employ 5 - 10% of the population in the “coal mines”.

Karoline Leavitt is extremely disappointed that you would even suggest that the President would ever— not be able — to disappear members of the Supreme Court.

The real Grok was all the Bluesky users we met along the way.

To survive medical school they need reading comprehension to memorize a bunch of medical textbooks. However listening comprehension, especially active listening, seems mostly optional.

I think that works. Though they could consider stealing a fascism helicopter and using it to fight another fascism helicopter as well.

I was like “this sounds 100% real” until I got to the Standard Prison Experiment.

“Sex reminds her of eating spaghetti”…

If the first example of a “primary source” you can come up with is Hitler, I can only assume you have read Mein Kampf and cite it regularly.

Okay…I didn’t really need to know about someone’s shrinking kink.

This attitude always benefits the most narcissistic and sociopathic among us.

Unless you can prove it a crime in a court of law then either it didn’t happen or it’s somehow allowed.

Depending on level of government and jurisdiction, some civil service rules go so far to suggest the perception that it could have affected decision making is “corrupt”.

This idea that we need to interpret the mental state of the recipient to determine whether it is a corrupt act is silly.

“After a hard stop, the 469 page 85 count indictment flew out the open window of the DA’s car and out into traffic, smashing into the window of Target A’s car, stopping it, with sheets flying out in all directions, obstructing Target B - V’s cars and causing Subject A -U’s cars to rear end them.”