Anthony
@udrcvr.bsky.social
This is my ranting about politics account
Why wouldn’t he? Because you’ll be very disappointed in him?
January 19, 2026 at 12:09 PM
Why wouldn’t he? Because you’ll be very disappointed in him?
Because Russia conducts violence against white people, which the media deems as bad
UAE conducts violence against brown people, which the media doesn’t care about
So it can justify taking a lot of money from them because there won’t be as much backlash
UAE conducts violence against brown people, which the media doesn’t care about
So it can justify taking a lot of money from them because there won’t be as much backlash
January 19, 2026 at 12:08 PM
Because Russia conducts violence against white people, which the media deems as bad
UAE conducts violence against brown people, which the media doesn’t care about
So it can justify taking a lot of money from them because there won’t be as much backlash
UAE conducts violence against brown people, which the media doesn’t care about
So it can justify taking a lot of money from them because there won’t be as much backlash
War isn’t good for economies
Even worse when you’re going to war with allies
Even worse when you’re going to war with allies
January 19, 2026 at 9:04 AM
War isn’t good for economies
Even worse when you’re going to war with allies
Even worse when you’re going to war with allies
Fuck man, this whole time was him on peace mode
What a dobber hope he dies x
What a dobber hope he dies x
January 19, 2026 at 8:50 AM
Fuck man, this whole time was him on peace mode
What a dobber hope he dies x
What a dobber hope he dies x
What you mean is that we’re underinvesting in things that you care about, which is a different matter and not one that I care about
January 19, 2026 at 8:11 AM
What you mean is that we’re underinvesting in things that you care about, which is a different matter and not one that I care about
It feels like you’re purposefully misrepresenting my argument so that you can argue against something you feel you can attack
I can’t reason you out of an opinion that you didn’t reason yourself into
You’re one of the “not living in the real world” people I was talking about
I can’t reason you out of an opinion that you didn’t reason yourself into
You’re one of the “not living in the real world” people I was talking about
January 19, 2026 at 8:09 AM
It feels like you’re purposefully misrepresenting my argument so that you can argue against something you feel you can attack
I can’t reason you out of an opinion that you didn’t reason yourself into
You’re one of the “not living in the real world” people I was talking about
I can’t reason you out of an opinion that you didn’t reason yourself into
You’re one of the “not living in the real world” people I was talking about
Everything is shit in the UK right now because we are over spending across the board, that is not localised to nuclear arms
And, at any rate, we do not need a large standing army if we have a capable nuclear system
We, as a species, didn’t grow out of war, nukes made it untenable
And, at any rate, we do not need a large standing army if we have a capable nuclear system
We, as a species, didn’t grow out of war, nukes made it untenable
January 19, 2026 at 8:06 AM
Everything is shit in the UK right now because we are over spending across the board, that is not localised to nuclear arms
And, at any rate, we do not need a large standing army if we have a capable nuclear system
We, as a species, didn’t grow out of war, nukes made it untenable
And, at any rate, we do not need a large standing army if we have a capable nuclear system
We, as a species, didn’t grow out of war, nukes made it untenable
Quite a lot of “probably”s in there
You’re willing to take the gamble?
You’re willing to take the gamble?
January 19, 2026 at 8:01 AM
Quite a lot of “probably”s in there
You’re willing to take the gamble?
You’re willing to take the gamble?
Do believe I’m saying it’s nukes OR a conventional military?
January 19, 2026 at 7:56 AM
Do believe I’m saying it’s nukes OR a conventional military?
Okay, another way
Do you think Putin would’ve used nukes in Ukraine by now if he wasn’t aware that he’d be nuked in retaliation?
Do you think Putin would’ve used nukes in Ukraine by now if he wasn’t aware that he’d be nuked in retaliation?
January 19, 2026 at 7:55 AM
Okay, another way
Do you think Putin would’ve used nukes in Ukraine by now if he wasn’t aware that he’d be nuked in retaliation?
Do you think Putin would’ve used nukes in Ukraine by now if he wasn’t aware that he’d be nuked in retaliation?
Sorry doesn’t actually cut it tbh
You’re in a position to do more
Making signs and hoping for common decency against fascists is tantamount to signing off their actions
You’re German citizens tutting during the Nazi uprising
You’re in a position to do more
Making signs and hoping for common decency against fascists is tantamount to signing off their actions
You’re German citizens tutting during the Nazi uprising
January 19, 2026 at 5:45 AM
Sorry doesn’t actually cut it tbh
You’re in a position to do more
Making signs and hoping for common decency against fascists is tantamount to signing off their actions
You’re German citizens tutting during the Nazi uprising
You’re in a position to do more
Making signs and hoping for common decency against fascists is tantamount to signing off their actions
You’re German citizens tutting during the Nazi uprising
The goal with these tariffs is to make life uncomfortable for Trump supporters and cause rebellion from within
The thing is, though, these people will believe anything dear leader says, so it isn’t going to impact his core support
They can be convinced of anything
The thing is, though, these people will believe anything dear leader says, so it isn’t going to impact his core support
They can be convinced of anything
January 19, 2026 at 5:43 AM
The goal with these tariffs is to make life uncomfortable for Trump supporters and cause rebellion from within
The thing is, though, these people will believe anything dear leader says, so it isn’t going to impact his core support
They can be convinced of anything
The thing is, though, these people will believe anything dear leader says, so it isn’t going to impact his core support
They can be convinced of anything
I don’t think the why matters
Colonial America must be stopped here or it’ll only continue encroaching further into its neighbours land
Colonial America must be stopped here or it’ll only continue encroaching further into its neighbours land
January 19, 2026 at 5:40 AM
I don’t think the why matters
Colonial America must be stopped here or it’ll only continue encroaching further into its neighbours land
Colonial America must be stopped here or it’ll only continue encroaching further into its neighbours land
Andrew Neil is one of the most odious cunts going but he’s right about this
Appeasement didn’t work the first time, why would it work the second?
Appeasement didn’t work the first time, why would it work the second?
January 19, 2026 at 3:50 AM
Andrew Neil is one of the most odious cunts going but he’s right about this
Appeasement didn’t work the first time, why would it work the second?
Appeasement didn’t work the first time, why would it work the second?
Why would they be mentioned as a part of this? This is retaliatory measures against American aggression
There already ARE tariffs and sanctions against Russia
There already ARE tariffs and sanctions against Russia
January 19, 2026 at 3:47 AM
Why would they be mentioned as a part of this? This is retaliatory measures against American aggression
There already ARE tariffs and sanctions against Russia
There already ARE tariffs and sanctions against Russia
The evil is the point
When the US left stops being little pussys and actually rises up, the Trump admin will use it as an excuse to declare martial law
And that’s when things get really bad
When the US left stops being little pussys and actually rises up, the Trump admin will use it as an excuse to declare martial law
And that’s when things get really bad
January 19, 2026 at 3:33 AM
The evil is the point
When the US left stops being little pussys and actually rises up, the Trump admin will use it as an excuse to declare martial law
And that’s when things get really bad
When the US left stops being little pussys and actually rises up, the Trump admin will use it as an excuse to declare martial law
And that’s when things get really bad
I think that where I’m coming from is that “we tried nothing and it didn’t work, sorry x” just isn’t good enough
People don’t see MAGA as the enemy, they see Americans as the enemy
By not trying to get rid of them, you’re allowing them to operate uncontested
You are responsible for your country
People don’t see MAGA as the enemy, they see Americans as the enemy
By not trying to get rid of them, you’re allowing them to operate uncontested
You are responsible for your country
January 19, 2026 at 3:25 AM
I think that where I’m coming from is that “we tried nothing and it didn’t work, sorry x” just isn’t good enough
People don’t see MAGA as the enemy, they see Americans as the enemy
By not trying to get rid of them, you’re allowing them to operate uncontested
You are responsible for your country
People don’t see MAGA as the enemy, they see Americans as the enemy
By not trying to get rid of them, you’re allowing them to operate uncontested
You are responsible for your country
I hate the constant effort to try and say “ah but (victim) was a bad person”
So fucking what, you can’t just shoot people
Also why do IMMIGRATION OFFICERS have guns in the first place?
So fucking what, you can’t just shoot people
Also why do IMMIGRATION OFFICERS have guns in the first place?
January 19, 2026 at 3:02 AM
I hate the constant effort to try and say “ah but (victim) was a bad person”
So fucking what, you can’t just shoot people
Also why do IMMIGRATION OFFICERS have guns in the first place?
So fucking what, you can’t just shoot people
Also why do IMMIGRATION OFFICERS have guns in the first place?
1) a lot of conflicts are not against nuclear powers
2) you don’t need them until you need them
3) what about the 10%?
Are you seriously of the opinion that Trump would not threaten to nuke someone if he believed he could do so with no repercussions?
2) you don’t need them until you need them
3) what about the 10%?
Are you seriously of the opinion that Trump would not threaten to nuke someone if he believed he could do so with no repercussions?
January 19, 2026 at 12:39 AM
1) a lot of conflicts are not against nuclear powers
2) you don’t need them until you need them
3) what about the 10%?
Are you seriously of the opinion that Trump would not threaten to nuke someone if he believed he could do so with no repercussions?
2) you don’t need them until you need them
3) what about the 10%?
Are you seriously of the opinion that Trump would not threaten to nuke someone if he believed he could do so with no repercussions?
I’m not American and I did say initially that one of my issues was that Americans want someone else to fix their problems for them
January 19, 2026 at 12:37 AM
I’m not American and I did say initially that one of my issues was that Americans want someone else to fix their problems for them
Don’t try and fight like Napoleonic armies then
Do something that takes tanks out of the way
Some dweeby college kid had him wearing a tampax for a week
Do something that takes tanks out of the way
Some dweeby college kid had him wearing a tampax for a week
January 18, 2026 at 5:09 PM
Don’t try and fight like Napoleonic armies then
Do something that takes tanks out of the way
Some dweeby college kid had him wearing a tampax for a week
Do something that takes tanks out of the way
Some dweeby college kid had him wearing a tampax for a week
Words are easy, action harder
I’m expected to be disappointed in any EU response to the inevitable invasion/hostile takeover of Greenland
I’m expected to be disappointed in any EU response to the inevitable invasion/hostile takeover of Greenland
January 18, 2026 at 1:42 PM
Words are easy, action harder
I’m expected to be disappointed in any EU response to the inevitable invasion/hostile takeover of Greenland
I’m expected to be disappointed in any EU response to the inevitable invasion/hostile takeover of Greenland
Surely another nation publishing them makes it even easier for his base to discard them as forged
January 18, 2026 at 1:38 PM
Surely another nation publishing them makes it even easier for his base to discard them as forged
The popularity of my ideas what the hell are you talking about I joined 3 hours ago
Touch grass lmao
Touch grass lmao
January 18, 2026 at 1:33 PM
The popularity of my ideas what the hell are you talking about I joined 3 hours ago
Touch grass lmao
Touch grass lmao