Justin.
banner
uhjustin.bsky.social
Justin.
@uhjustin.bsky.social
pianist, programmer, cat-lover, an actual burrito
December 5, 2025 at 1:59 AM
KTJ makes a valid point. The court went out of its way to trample rights it’s ostensibly protecting because of deference to the executive under “Unified Executive Theory.”
December 3, 2025 at 1:29 AM
9 months gestation, months of raising an infant. Foregoing a cheap, easily available medicine just to watch die painfully. It’s tough to understand, but it’s happened three times in a year in Kentucky.
December 1, 2025 at 1:26 AM
Is it a good sign that the Times is taking on the tone of Stuart Smalley
November 27, 2025 at 2:51 PM
She has asked doctors, which only leaves us with your conclusion.
November 27, 2025 at 6:12 AM
What’s this garbage? He spends all article saying it’s not her fault, it’s the system’s fault, and then doesn’t even have the bravery to say outright that the system is bad. Just that maybe he thinks it could possibly be.

Anyway, he sucks. She sucks. All these people suck.
November 21, 2025 at 6:55 PM
Got a laugh out of the Tuesday bit.

But this is the part that bothers me. Congress should go after him and hold him reconcile for his behavior. Federal courts have often tried. But ultimately the conservative project is itself so riddled with corruption that they would never. Can never.
November 19, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Some kind of potato
November 19, 2025 at 10:28 AM
Hmmm
November 11, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Look at this cat and tell her she can’t have a free house. Just try.
October 23, 2025 at 11:34 PM
This is odd
October 9, 2025 at 1:28 AM
From the Times morning newsletter. I hate this kind of framing. The key reason for birthright citizenship isn’t precedent. It’s the 13th amendment. The Times knows this. They could’ve noted that was the constitutional argument at the center of the case. Instead, we’re told it’s just about precedent.
October 6, 2025 at 11:27 AM
There are times when I want to go beyond the headline to see if there’s anything interesting or introspective they have to say. I tried. But they asked me to go a step too far.
October 4, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Judging by some of the account names, I think some of them are forgetting to log out before getting on and trying to attack AOC “from the left.” Plenty of just shitty people though.
October 2, 2025 at 10:39 PM
Reread your own post until your what you said is drilled into your own head.
September 26, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Here have got to be a few dozen Latkes but this one is my work buddy
September 25, 2025 at 12:38 AM
The best Vance role-playing we got in action from the time he got donuts.
September 22, 2025 at 12:22 PM
Just a heads up on the setting for it. Not hard to find.
September 20, 2025 at 1:32 AM
This is the right. This is their violence. Even in the wake of the president getting what he wants and stepping all over free speech, all he continues to do is project hate and threaten people. You want to be his apologist? Don’t be surprised when America wants nothing to do with you.
September 18, 2025 at 6:54 AM
Flop cat buddies
August 30, 2025 at 6:32 PM
They won’t tell his family. They won’t talk to the press. This is beyond unacceptable. The machine that this administration has built to carry this out is inhuman and unacceptable in a free society and must be torn apart.
August 27, 2025 at 7:58 AM
This is the rest of that conversation. If there’s a human mind behind that account, it’s not one I can comprehend. I guess I’m glad someone is keeping the spirit of insane internet nonsense alive.
August 26, 2025 at 8:05 AM
I didn’t make this but it’s great.
August 24, 2025 at 7:44 AM
This bit reminds me of arguments about funding against crime in Baja California in the 90’s. People wanted youth programs and infrastructure. That was “too expensive.” The government offered militarized police with shotguns patrolling streets. Crime got worse, some police joined the cartels.
August 19, 2025 at 8:36 AM
Man, they’re always like that
August 19, 2025 at 7:53 AM