Ullrich Ecker
@ulliecker.bsky.social
6.3K followers 420 following 32 posts
I study effects of misinformation. Professor at the School of Psychological Science and Fellow of the Public Policy Institute at the University of Western Australia Views my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ulliecker.bsky.social
Why Misinformation Must Not Be Ignored

Quite proud of this paper, which just received the journal's APA Editor's Choice award 😊

Big thanks to my coauthors Li Qian Tay, Jon Roozenbeek,
@profsanderlinden.bsky.social, John Cook, @naomioreskes.bsky.social, and @lewan.bsky.social
apajournals.bsky.social
Why #misinformation must not be ignored - A new, open access article by @ulliecker.bsky.social and colleagues, published in American Psychologist bit.ly/4pJ20fY
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
lkfazio.bsky.social
Honored to receive the Chancellor's Award for Research for this co-authored paper on the psychology of misinformation. It was really affirming to receive recognition for this research while the field is under attack and misinfo grants are being cancelled. 1/

www.nature.com/articles/s44...
A fancy silver mint julip cup engraved with Chancellor's Award for Research and my name sitting on a wooden shelf with a poster reading "Science and everyday life cannot and should not be separated" - Rosalind Franklin, a glass lego figure, and some other knickknacks Photo of all the awardees with Vanderbilt leadership. Lisa's in a green dress and holding a silver cup
ulliecker.bsky.social
Great ECR job opportunity on the project “A Unified Computational Model of How Humans Use Automated Advice”: external.jobs.uwa.edu.au/en/job/52075...
Prospective staff : Jobs at UWA : The University Of Western Australia
external.jobs.uwa.edu.au
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
carlbergstrom.com
AI summaries kill search traffic. This has been an obvious consequence of Google's AI summary strategy since its inception.

Apparently the training data is so valuable that Google is willing to risk the neck of the goose that lays golden eggs.

Screenshot: thebullshitmachines.com/lesson-9-blu...
Screenshot from Modern-Day Oracles or Bullshit Machines (Bergstrom and West 2025).

People wandering through a desert mirage, with the text:

"We anticipate powerful, damaging spillover effects. If no one follows web links, there will be few incentives for people to create high-quality content in the first place.

Meanwhile large language models make it easy to produce low-quality content at the touch of a button. Quality human-created information may be swamped by AI-generated bullshit."
ulliecker.bsky.social
A very important paper led by the phenomenal @lucy-h-butler.bsky.social

Say it with me: Corrections. Of. Scientific. Misinformation. Are. Effective.

@lewan.bsky.social @profsanderlinden.bsky.social @lkfazio.bsky.social @tobyprike.bsky.social @brionyswire.bsky.social @emilyspearing.bsky.social
lucy-h-butler.bsky.social
A 2023 NHB paper concluded that corrections of science-relevant misinformation are, on average, ineffective. Our response (in press) challenges this conclusion, showing why corrections *are* effective, and why considering measurement is important:
🔗 osf.io/preprints/ps...
(1/5)
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
mattnurse.com
Hey Australia, let's stay out of this one, yeah?
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
kimwade.bsky.social
Thanks so much for a fabulous #sarmac2025, @ciaragreene.bsky.social @gillian-murphy.bsky.social! Many details made it such a joyess Irish-tinted celebration of the sarmac community. You're legends & we're immensely grateful ❤️ And I'm wildly proud of this lot too! (Thxs for putting up with me x)
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
lkfazio.bsky.social
Finally Mitch Dobbs on how correcting false claims can affect source credibility. Why do we see differences between politicians and doctors (corrections decrease trust in lying doctors but not politicians)? Possibly differences in initial trust. #sarmac2025 26/
The Impacts of Intent and Uncertainty on Source Credibility Following the Correction of Misinformation

Mitch Dobbs
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
lkfazio.bsky.social
Next is @ulliecker.bsky.social on misinformation spread in communication chains. Rather than look at transmission from one to many (eg social media), look at peer-to-peer transmission of misinformation corrections (game of telephone). #sarmac2025 21/
Misinformation Spread in Communication Chains

Toby Prike, Bradley Walker, Nicolas Fay, Andrew Perfors, Yoshihisa Kashima,& Ullrich Ecker
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
lkfazio.bsky.social
Next @emilyspearing.bsky.social on AI-generated misinformation, its influence and how to correct it. Expected more misinfo reliance in human and AI condition, inoculation would reduce beliefs, trust boost would increase belief and disclaimer would have no impact.

#sarmac2025 24/
Photo of Emily in front of slide 
Trust the Machine:

Examining Reliance on Al-Generated Misinformation and How to Reduce It

Emily R. Spearing, Constantina I. Gile, Amy L. Fogwill, Toby Prike, Briony Swire-Thompson, Stephan Lewandowsky, & Ullrich K. H. Ecker E1: Method & Predicted Results

Generic article

Al-generated misleading article about the benefits of "trickle-down economics"

Trust Boost

Al algorithms process information neutrally and consistently...

Inoculation

Al-generated Information can reflect human biases and stereotypes...

Disclaimer

Chat GPT can make mistakes. Check important info
ulliecker.bsky.social
Oh wow, my alma mater!
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
ulliecker.bsky.social
...with papers by @rmpillai.bsky.social, @lkfazio.bsky.social, Jonas De keersmaecker, @emilyspearing.bsky.social, @kimwade.bsky.social, @moorepsych.bsky.social, @maddyjalbert.bsky.social, Nikita Salovich, Ariana Modirrousta-Galian, Sharon Leal, Alison Butler, Samuel Robson, Emil Skog
ulliecker.bsky.social
Very glad to see this out:

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Special Issue
Misinformation: Current Directions and New Insights

psycnet.apa.org/PsycARTICLES...
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.org
Reposted by Ullrich Ecker
officialsarmac.bsky.social
Coming soon, a special issue of #JARMAC on #Misinformation: Current Directions and New Insights, guest edited by Ulli Ecker. @apajournals.bsky.social
ulliecker.bsky.social
In a nutshell, we explain how statements that beliefs do not correlate well with behaviors can be misleading, if taken to imply that beliefs are unlikely to cause behaviors.

Thanks to @lewan.bsky.social @profsanderlinden.bsky.social @emilyspearing.bsky.social and Li Qian Tay.