@unstattedcommoner.bsky.social
@loweringthebar.bsky.social
'1. The issue in this case is whether “gold pieces” as a form of wealth in a video game constitute property within the meaning of s. 4 of the Theft Act 1968.'
(Answer: Yes.)
R v Lakeman [2026] EWCA Crim 4 www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...
'1. The issue in this case is whether “gold pieces” as a form of wealth in a video game constitute property within the meaning of s. 4 of the Theft Act 1968.'
(Answer: Yes.)
R v Lakeman [2026] EWCA Crim 4 www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...
February 8, 2026 at 12:34 PM
@loweringthebar.bsky.social
'1. The issue in this case is whether “gold pieces” as a form of wealth in a video game constitute property within the meaning of s. 4 of the Theft Act 1968.'
(Answer: Yes.)
R v Lakeman [2026] EWCA Crim 4 www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...
'1. The issue in this case is whether “gold pieces” as a form of wealth in a video game constitute property within the meaning of s. 4 of the Theft Act 1968.'
(Answer: Yes.)
R v Lakeman [2026] EWCA Crim 4 www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...