Utek, PhD
@utekleong.bsky.social
Psychologist; Also, a filthy legacy storm enjoyer
utekleong.github.io
utekleong.github.io
😫 maybe next time you are back! Enjoy the food!
May 7, 2025 at 5:06 PM
😫 maybe next time you are back! Enjoy the food!
Was looking forward to meeting you at Sacha’s lab meeting but I’ll be flying off on that day. Unfortunate!
May 6, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Was looking forward to meeting you at Sacha’s lab meeting but I’ll be flying off on that day. Unfortunate!
Reposted by Utek, PhD
Critics: "We think your research is flawed because of those reasons that were reviewed by other scientists who shared our concerns"
Authors: "Thank your for your incompetent criticism. Our full rebuttal is: no"
Journals: "Science was achieved today through scholarly debate. Please move along"
Authors: "Thank your for your incompetent criticism. Our full rebuttal is: no"
Journals: "Science was achieved today through scholarly debate. Please move along"
a man with a mustache is holding a piece of paper with the word science written on it .
ALT: a man with a mustache is holding a piece of paper with the word science written on it .
media.tenor.com
May 2, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Critics: "We think your research is flawed because of those reasons that were reviewed by other scientists who shared our concerns"
Authors: "Thank your for your incompetent criticism. Our full rebuttal is: no"
Journals: "Science was achieved today through scholarly debate. Please move along"
Authors: "Thank your for your incompetent criticism. Our full rebuttal is: no"
Journals: "Science was achieved today through scholarly debate. Please move along"
This wasn’t like 30 self-citations by the way.
It was 12. 2 were R packages, 5 were studies that my paper built on. The rest were methodological papers that my co-author was part of.
It was 12. 2 were R packages, 5 were studies that my paper built on. The rest were methodological papers that my co-author was part of.
March 21, 2025 at 11:09 AM
This wasn’t like 30 self-citations by the way.
It was 12. 2 were R packages, 5 were studies that my paper built on. The rest were methodological papers that my co-author was part of.
It was 12. 2 were R packages, 5 were studies that my paper built on. The rest were methodological papers that my co-author was part of.
What rubbish is this? Truly an exercise in futility.
March 21, 2025 at 5:40 AM
What rubbish is this? Truly an exercise in futility.
How to not self-cite our work if our current study is rests on my co-authors’ theoretical and methodological work? Should I not give them credit for their work?
Rather than let me cite relevant work, asks me to cite the preprint and dataset. Which adds to the self-cite count
Rather than let me cite relevant work, asks me to cite the preprint and dataset. Which adds to the self-cite count
March 21, 2025 at 5:40 AM
How to not self-cite our work if our current study is rests on my co-authors’ theoretical and methodological work? Should I not give them credit for their work?
Rather than let me cite relevant work, asks me to cite the preprint and dataset. Which adds to the self-cite count
Rather than let me cite relevant work, asks me to cite the preprint and dataset. Which adds to the self-cite count