Value Realignment Initiative
@valuerealignment.bsky.social
Rewriting the rules of value.
Exploring how we realign wealth, status & success around impact—not indulgence. Founder @EveryDrop. Designing tools for a better world.
Exploring how we realign wealth, status & success around impact—not indulgence. Founder @EveryDrop. Designing tools for a better world.
You can browse the list. Support a project. Share the message. Spread the word.
📎 www.cgdev.org/blog/buildin...
But more than that—this is a model worth learning from.
Speed + legitimacy.
Expertise + humility.
A system built for urgency, not bureaucracy.
📎 www.cgdev.org/blog/buildin...
But more than that—this is a model worth learning from.
Speed + legitimacy.
Expertise + humility.
A system built for urgency, not bureaucracy.
Building the Future of Aid—Starting Now: Strategic Lessons from a Crisis
Despite what administration officials have claimed about preserving life-saving work, many of the programs delivering interventions known to save the most lives per dollar spent have not received the ...
www.cgdev.org
May 25, 2025 at 7:45 AM
You can browse the list. Support a project. Share the message. Spread the word.
📎 www.cgdev.org/blog/buildin...
But more than that—this is a model worth learning from.
Speed + legitimacy.
Expertise + humility.
A system built for urgency, not bureaucracy.
📎 www.cgdev.org/blog/buildin...
But more than that—this is a model worth learning from.
Speed + legitimacy.
Expertise + humility.
A system built for urgency, not bureaucracy.
The result: a curated list of projects that could absorb money today and deliver outsized impact.
It’s a pipeline—prepped by experts and grounded in local reality.
Think of it as:
➡️ the shortlist you wish existed
➡️ the guide funders say they don’t have
➡️ the future of aid, if we’re serious
It’s a pipeline—prepped by experts and grounded in local reality.
Think of it as:
➡️ the shortlist you wish existed
➡️ the guide funders say they don’t have
➡️ the future of aid, if we’re serious
May 25, 2025 at 7:42 AM
The result: a curated list of projects that could absorb money today and deliver outsized impact.
It’s a pipeline—prepped by experts and grounded in local reality.
Think of it as:
➡️ the shortlist you wish existed
➡️ the guide funders say they don’t have
➡️ the future of aid, if we’re serious
It’s a pipeline—prepped by experts and grounded in local reality.
Think of it as:
➡️ the shortlist you wish existed
➡️ the guide funders say they don’t have
➡️ the future of aid, if we’re serious
Then they did the hard part: vetting.
Not just “does it look good on paper?”
But:
✅ Is it evidence-based?
✅ Is it urgent?
✅ Is it scalable?
✅ Is it fundable—right now?
Their methodology is transparent, unbiased and rigorous.
Their results, open source.
Not just “does it look good on paper?”
But:
✅ Is it evidence-based?
✅ Is it urgent?
✅ Is it scalable?
✅ Is it fundable—right now?
Their methodology is transparent, unbiased and rigorous.
Their results, open source.
May 25, 2025 at 7:41 AM
Then they did the hard part: vetting.
Not just “does it look good on paper?”
But:
✅ Is it evidence-based?
✅ Is it urgent?
✅ Is it scalable?
✅ Is it fundable—right now?
Their methodology is transparent, unbiased and rigorous.
Their results, open source.
Not just “does it look good on paper?”
But:
✅ Is it evidence-based?
✅ Is it urgent?
✅ Is it scalable?
✅ Is it fundable—right now?
Their methodology is transparent, unbiased and rigorous.
Their results, open source.
They didn’t rely on second-hand reports.
They went straight to the source by interviewing:
→ Local orgs
→ Field project leads
→ Governments and multilaterals orgs
They asked the orgs to 'radically' reimagine their project: With limited funds, how much support is needed to maximize project impact?
They went straight to the source by interviewing:
→ Local orgs
→ Field project leads
→ Governments and multilaterals orgs
They asked the orgs to 'radically' reimagine their project: With limited funds, how much support is needed to maximize project impact?
May 25, 2025 at 7:39 AM
They didn’t rely on second-hand reports.
They went straight to the source by interviewing:
→ Local orgs
→ Field project leads
→ Governments and multilaterals orgs
They asked the orgs to 'radically' reimagine their project: With limited funds, how much support is needed to maximize project impact?
They went straight to the source by interviewing:
→ Local orgs
→ Field project leads
→ Governments and multilaterals orgs
They asked the orgs to 'radically' reimagine their project: With limited funds, how much support is needed to maximize project impact?
As others looked on in horror, @cgdev.org hired some of the ex-USAID leaders and aid experts to answer the most pressing question:
"Of all the projects that lost funding, which are the most urgent, the most effective, the most life-saving?"
And then they built a process to answer that question...
"Of all the projects that lost funding, which are the most urgent, the most effective, the most life-saving?"
And then they built a process to answer that question...
May 25, 2025 at 7:37 AM
As others looked on in horror, @cgdev.org hired some of the ex-USAID leaders and aid experts to answer the most pressing question:
"Of all the projects that lost funding, which are the most urgent, the most effective, the most life-saving?"
And then they built a process to answer that question...
"Of all the projects that lost funding, which are the most urgent, the most effective, the most life-saving?"
And then they built a process to answer that question...
Lol. Love to see the shrimp welfare project having a sense of humor. Great promotion for an innovative new charity type that seems to understand its perception challenge.
May 18, 2025 at 5:09 AM
Lol. Love to see the shrimp welfare project having a sense of humor. Great promotion for an innovative new charity type that seems to understand its perception challenge.