Skylar Walsh
@veganimal.bsky.social
Armchair Pundit Productions - @ArmchairPundi10 #LandBack
DM for video work/collabs - Living with gratitude in Sinixt tmxʷúlaʔxʷ (territory)
Sinixt are not Extinct! Please consider donating https://sinixt.org/support/
DM for video work/collabs - Living with gratitude in Sinixt tmxʷúlaʔxʷ (territory)
Sinixt are not Extinct! Please consider donating https://sinixt.org/support/
The media at large, and negative attention for the party for letting Engler run.
The media loves to ignore NDP unless they can highlight something they think will make them look bad.
Engler is normy rage-bait personified and you know the average journo here wouldn't pass up the opportunity
The media loves to ignore NDP unless they can highlight something they think will make them look bad.
Engler is normy rage-bait personified and you know the average journo here wouldn't pass up the opportunity
February 3, 2026 at 3:57 AM
The media at large, and negative attention for the party for letting Engler run.
The media loves to ignore NDP unless they can highlight something they think will make them look bad.
Engler is normy rage-bait personified and you know the average journo here wouldn't pass up the opportunity
The media loves to ignore NDP unless they can highlight something they think will make them look bad.
Engler is normy rage-bait personified and you know the average journo here wouldn't pass up the opportunity
I think the establishment of the NDP is so timid that even the shadow of valid criticism is enough to make them take the cowardly road.
Yet they are never afraid to stand ten toes strong on their bad decisions.
My hope is, though they had the power to stop Engler, Avi is too organized to thwart
Yet they are never afraid to stand ten toes strong on their bad decisions.
My hope is, though they had the power to stop Engler, Avi is too organized to thwart
February 3, 2026 at 3:53 AM
I think the establishment of the NDP is so timid that even the shadow of valid criticism is enough to make them take the cowardly road.
Yet they are never afraid to stand ten toes strong on their bad decisions.
My hope is, though they had the power to stop Engler, Avi is too organized to thwart
Yet they are never afraid to stand ten toes strong on their bad decisions.
My hope is, though they had the power to stop Engler, Avi is too organized to thwart
If the party is worried about the negative attention Engler is going to bring, why wouldn't they be equally worried about it from his EXPLICIT proxy candidate?
Your pizza is negative attention, and they don't care who serves it.
Your pizza is negative attention, and they don't care who serves it.
February 3, 2026 at 3:40 AM
If the party is worried about the negative attention Engler is going to bring, why wouldn't they be equally worried about it from his EXPLICIT proxy candidate?
Your pizza is negative attention, and they don't care who serves it.
Your pizza is negative attention, and they don't care who serves it.
His team has spent a lot of time trying to discredit Avi, who is inarguably the most left candidate approved to run.
Engler sticks to his principles but his tactics are 🐕🦺💩 and self defeating
Engler sticks to his principles but his tactics are 🐕🦺💩 and self defeating
February 3, 2026 at 3:29 AM
His team has spent a lot of time trying to discredit Avi, who is inarguably the most left candidate approved to run.
Engler sticks to his principles but his tactics are 🐕🦺💩 and self defeating
Engler sticks to his principles but his tactics are 🐕🦺💩 and self defeating
Mugyenyi only applied to run after Engler was denied and explicitly stated that she would withdraw if the party reversed its decision on Engler.
Why would you let an explicit proxy candidate for someone you denied run? Would defeat the purpose of denying the person in the first place, I would think
Why would you let an explicit proxy candidate for someone you denied run? Would defeat the purpose of denying the person in the first place, I would think
February 3, 2026 at 3:27 AM
Mugyenyi only applied to run after Engler was denied and explicitly stated that she would withdraw if the party reversed its decision on Engler.
Why would you let an explicit proxy candidate for someone you denied run? Would defeat the purpose of denying the person in the first place, I would think
Why would you let an explicit proxy candidate for someone you denied run? Would defeat the purpose of denying the person in the first place, I would think
From others I have engaged with, we seem to be in common company
February 3, 2026 at 3:21 AM
From others I have engaged with, we seem to be in common company
His recent guilty verdict, however, is absolutely egregious.
Just incredible overreach which will have long lasting effects on organized advocacy campaigns.
Just incredible overreach which will have long lasting effects on organized advocacy campaigns.
February 3, 2026 at 3:19 AM
His recent guilty verdict, however, is absolutely egregious.
Just incredible overreach which will have long lasting effects on organized advocacy campaigns.
Just incredible overreach which will have long lasting effects on organized advocacy campaigns.
I genuinely don't know how I feel about the ruling to deny Engler the opportunity to run.
My instinct would be to let him, but he is problematic so I understand why you would want to avoid the distraction.
I know he faces false accusations, but there ARE legitimate things to be concerned for.
My instinct would be to let him, but he is problematic so I understand why you would want to avoid the distraction.
I know he faces false accusations, but there ARE legitimate things to be concerned for.
February 3, 2026 at 3:18 AM
I genuinely don't know how I feel about the ruling to deny Engler the opportunity to run.
My instinct would be to let him, but he is problematic so I understand why you would want to avoid the distraction.
I know he faces false accusations, but there ARE legitimate things to be concerned for.
My instinct would be to let him, but he is problematic so I understand why you would want to avoid the distraction.
I know he faces false accusations, but there ARE legitimate things to be concerned for.
Also, I left the party because of the establishment shenanigans and only came back to support @avilewis.ca
I know the backroom choices are the exact problem, but Avi seems to have a real chance for change
I was surprised to find I liked other candidates too though, particularly Tanille Johnson.
I know the backroom choices are the exact problem, but Avi seems to have a real chance for change
I was surprised to find I liked other candidates too though, particularly Tanille Johnson.
February 3, 2026 at 3:06 AM
Also, I left the party because of the establishment shenanigans and only came back to support @avilewis.ca
I know the backroom choices are the exact problem, but Avi seems to have a real chance for change
I was surprised to find I liked other candidates too though, particularly Tanille Johnson.
I know the backroom choices are the exact problem, but Avi seems to have a real chance for change
I was surprised to find I liked other candidates too though, particularly Tanille Johnson.
Depends if you agree with the denial of Engler in the 1st place
Personally, I would've been for letting him run but I understand why a party wouldn't, even without bad intent
He still has a tweet up stating "80% of world Jewry supports the genocide" with no credible evidence to back it up for ex.
Personally, I would've been for letting him run but I understand why a party wouldn't, even without bad intent
He still has a tweet up stating "80% of world Jewry supports the genocide" with no credible evidence to back it up for ex.
February 3, 2026 at 3:00 AM
Depends if you agree with the denial of Engler in the 1st place
Personally, I would've been for letting him run but I understand why a party wouldn't, even without bad intent
He still has a tweet up stating "80% of world Jewry supports the genocide" with no credible evidence to back it up for ex.
Personally, I would've been for letting him run but I understand why a party wouldn't, even without bad intent
He still has a tweet up stating "80% of world Jewry supports the genocide" with no credible evidence to back it up for ex.
My point wasn't that there is a proxy bylaw, simply the claim that she is a proxy candidate is valid. Something for which your article seems to imply the opposite.
February 3, 2026 at 12:49 AM
My point wasn't that there is a proxy bylaw, simply the claim that she is a proxy candidate is valid. Something for which your article seems to imply the opposite.
With respect, that isn't just an acknowledgement of running after but an explicit offer to rescind her candidacy if they reversed the denial of Engler's.
That seems pretty material to claims of proxy 🤷♂️
That seems pretty material to claims of proxy 🤷♂️
February 3, 2026 at 12:22 AM
With respect, that isn't just an acknowledgement of running after but an explicit offer to rescind her candidacy if they reversed the denial of Engler's.
That seems pretty material to claims of proxy 🤷♂️
That seems pretty material to claims of proxy 🤷♂️
Literally a white supremacist. Putin still sucks, but we don't have to glaze white nationalists.
February 1, 2026 at 6:37 AM
Literally a white supremacist. Putin still sucks, but we don't have to glaze white nationalists.