I regret that she did not reveal her corruption earlier. But dedicating the prize to 45 was a huge, massive red flag.

Did you make this meme? The "creative liberties" on paraphrasing what President Sheinbaum actually said are pretty stark.

Asking for compassion & mercy, being "patient & forgiving" only encourages sadistic sociopaths to torture & torment further. It affirms that their power plays are successful. The good-hearted people will hear & honor your request. The others will become more evil & rapacious. Respond with awareness.

& I couldn't find any other example of a Nobel Peace Prize winner "dedicating" an award to a leader of a foreign country. Interesting that she would do so, is considered quite far-right leaning, & is deeply invested in obtaining the leadership position herself. You imagine no conflict of interest?

Yeah AltFDA is now the one not citing sources & doing the predictable bullshit of screaming & shaming people for "not doing research" when we knew that manipulated algorithms are a constant presence to contend with. Go to hell, but thanks for revealing yourselves on the way there.

Also pondering the phrase "accumulation by dispossession."

Though I approve that Clinton has called for all Epstein files mentioning him to be released, other than that, I wish he would shut the hell up & go away since, it looks to me, he is an egotistical opportunist who loves the spotlight. Hilary chose to stay with him & she's written about her choice.

Yeah, as I have mentioned twice before, I watched her TED talk. She talked about cyberbullying. People treated her similarly to how they treated Stormy Daniels, or worse because the internet was still so young & people couldn't reach out to her with support even if they wanted to. Context.

False equivalence. Abuse of power is not the same as absolute power. On the spectrum of unethical behavior, equating the actions of a consenting young adult with barely pubescent girls completely trapped by the Epstein ring is wrong. By your logic, no woman should be with a man due to patriarchy.

I do see it from a perspective of power. But you're saying Clinton had absolute power & Lewinsky had absolutely none, regardless of what she has said. You are the one completely dismissing the agency that she exercised in her mistakes or choices during & after the height of the situation.

How much of your opinion is based off of Lewinsky's testimony and public presentations of information?

Not talking pedos. Consent is absolutely an issue in asymmetric power imbalances between consenting adults. It's why it's not "essentially rape." From what I've read, her reflections on the situation have changed since the TED talk, but she didn't feel physically threatened or given false promises.

I watched Lewinsky's TED Talk. Was illuminating. I wouldn't go so far to say "predator" about him since she felt in love with him. She was a young adult, in a life-consuming situation with her internship, it shouldn't have happened, but was that a pattern of behavior with him?

How much did prices range depending on perceived complexion and ethnic background?

Another attempt to signal 1776. Sigh.

So, the difference between manslaughter and murder. I think what the quote means is, if one's incompetence & dysfunctional system of management ended up killing a lot of people, it's going to look a lot more like murder than manslaughter. At that degree of systemic "incompetence", it's "malice."

There once was a fiend named trumpstein
Who was keen to stay unseen
Through obscuring facts
For all cruel acts
Revealed in evil scenes

Could make a social media trend where people send in their redesign submissions.

They're gonna argue that no matter what anyway. They have an end result they want and they'll pull whatever manipulations they want to rationalize it. Like with "presidential immunity." We all* know it is completely unconstitutional. Thus, they attempt to rewrite the Constitution.