Victoria Zunitch
@vickizun.bsky.social
Writer, Editor, Journalist
Science Recognizer
President Criticizer
In for a penny, in for a pound.
Science Recognizer
President Criticizer
In for a penny, in for a pound.
Reposted by Victoria Zunitch
Didn’t he have something to do with Epstein money transfers? Why didn’t he have an issue there?
November 30, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Didn’t he have something to do with Epstein money transfers? Why didn’t he have an issue there?
Reposted by Victoria Zunitch
NYPD should be protecting New Yorkers, not fascist out-of-town agitators.
November 29, 2025 at 5:20 PM
NYPD should be protecting New Yorkers, not fascist out-of-town agitators.
And good lord, he's mature.
November 30, 2025 at 2:36 AM
And good lord, he's mature.
Fellow citizens, this Is your periodic reminder that a DOJ memo* isn't a law.
Even if written by the OLC.
*This isn't the only DOJ memo that is dead wrong. See "Criminals Can't Be Prosecuted if They're President," an object lesson in circular thinking, logical fallacies, and softmindedness.
Even if written by the OLC.
*This isn't the only DOJ memo that is dead wrong. See "Criminals Can't Be Prosecuted if They're President," an object lesson in circular thinking, logical fallacies, and softmindedness.
November 29, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Fellow citizens, this Is your periodic reminder that a DOJ memo* isn't a law.
Even if written by the OLC.
*This isn't the only DOJ memo that is dead wrong. See "Criminals Can't Be Prosecuted if They're President," an object lesson in circular thinking, logical fallacies, and softmindedness.
Even if written by the OLC.
*This isn't the only DOJ memo that is dead wrong. See "Criminals Can't Be Prosecuted if They're President," an object lesson in circular thinking, logical fallacies, and softmindedness.